In the case of the Federal Reserve, Supreme Court appears to carve out a murky exception

Associated Press (AP)CenterEN 6 min read 100% complete by By  CHRISTOPHER RUGABERJanuary 23, 2026 at 04:53 PM
In the case of the Federal Reserve, Supreme Court appears to carve out a murky exception

AI Summary

long article 6 min

In January 2026, the Supreme Court heard arguments regarding the Federal Reserve's independence. While the court has previously allowed President Trump to remove heads of other independent agencies, it appears to be making an exception for the Fed. The court signaled it views the Federal Reserve differently, suggesting the president can only remove Fed governors "for cause," such as neglect of duty or malfeasance. This distinction was highlighted in a previous ruling where the court allowed the firing of officials from the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board, but differentiated the Fed due to its "uniquely structured, quasi-private entity" status. The case raises questions about the extent of presidential power over independent agencies.

Keywords

federal reserve 100% supreme court 90% independent agencies 70% president donald trump 60% removal power 60% governors 50% for cause 50% quasi-private entity 40%

Sentiment Analysis

Neutral
Score: 0.05

Source Transparency

Source
Associated Press (AP)
Political Lean
Center (0.00)
Far LeftCenterFar Right
Classification Confidence
90%
Geographic Perspective
Washington

This article was automatically classified using rule-based analysis. The political bias score ranges from -1 (far left) to +1 (far right).

Topic Connections

Explore how the topics in this article connect to other news stories

No topic relationship data available yet. This graph will appear once topic relationships have been computed.
Explore Full Topic Graph