The
Trump administration said Wednesday that the
United States was withdrawing from 66 international agreements, including a major climate change treaty. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or UNFCCC, is the treaty that sets a legal framework for international negotiations to address climate change.Credit...Andreas Rentz/Getty ImagesJan. 7, 2026, 8:16 p.m. ETWhat is the UNFCCC treaty?Established in 1992, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or UNFCCC, is the treaty that sets a legal framework for international negotiations to address climate change. Under the treaty’s umbrella, nations gather every year to hammer out how they can collectively slow down the warming of the Earth’s atmosphere, which is caused principally by the burning of coal, oil and gas.After years of negotiation, led in part by the
United States and
China, countries of the world agreed in 2015 to each set their own targets to reduce rising greenhouse gas emissions. That’s known widely as the
Paris Agreement, because it was reached at a meeting in Paris under the auspices of the Convention on Climate Change.The convention has an office in
Bonn,
Germany, and a staff of around 450. The
United States customarily pays for around 20 percent of its core budget. Last year, when the
Trump administration withdrew the U.S. contribution, the philanthropist and former Mayor Michael Bloomberg filled the gap.Who else is a party?Since 1992, 197 countries have ratified the convention. The
United States was the first industrialized country to join, after ratification by the U.S. Senate.Does a U.S. withdrawal matter?It makes the
United States an outlier. It matters with regard to America’s standing in the world, especially in the eyes of vulnerable countries that correctly point out that the
United States is responsible for the largest share of the cumulative climate pollution heating up the Earth’s atmosphere.Once the U.S. is out of a treaty, it’s hard for it to get back in. Ratifying a treaty requires a two-thirds majority in the U.S. Senate, an elusive task in today’s polarized politics.The announcement said the withdrawal would take a year to go into effect.Why now?The administration instructed the
State Department last February to review U.S. support for all global agreements and organizations. It imposed a 180-day deadline, which expired in August, 2025.What are the implications?The move takes the
United States out of global discussions on renewable energy and measures to adapt to climate hazards. “It is not only self-defeating to let other countries write the global rules of the road for the inevitable transition to clean energy, but also to skip out on trillions of dollars in investment, jobs, lower energy costs, and new markets for American clean technologies,” said Manish Bapna, head of the Natural Resources Defense Council.Somini Sengupta is the international climate reporter on the Times climate team.SKIP Site IndexNewsHome PageU.S.WorldPoliticsNew YorkEducationSportsBusinessTechScienceWeatherThe Great ReadObituariesHeadwayVisual InvestigationsThe MagazineArtsBook ReviewBest Sellers Book ListDanceMoviesMusicPop CultureTelevisionTheaterVisual ArtsLifestyleHealthWellFoodRestaurant ReviewsLoveTravelStyleFashionReal EstateT MagazineOpinionToday's OpinionColumnistsEditorialsGuest EssaysOp-DocsLettersSunday OpinionOpinion VideoOpinion AudioMoreAudioGamesCookingWirecutterThe AthleticJobsVideoGraphicsTrendingLive EventsCorrectionsReader CenterTimesMachineThe Learning NetworkSchool of The NYTinEducationAccountSubscribeManage My AccountHome DeliveryGift SubscriptionsGroup SubscriptionsGift ArticlesEmail NewslettersNYT LicensingReplica EditionTimes Store