Flock adds safeguards to licence-plate readers after wave of stalking cases
Flock Safety, a US firm operating approximately 120,000 automatic license-plate readers, has implemented new privacy safeguards. This action follows reports that at least 46 law enforcement officers across the US misused these AI-powered cameras for unauthorized tracking, including stalking.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedFlock Safety, a US firm operating approximately 120,000 automatic license-plate readers, has implemented new privacy safeguards. This action follows reports that at least 46 law enforcement officers across the US misused these AI-powered cameras for unauthorized tracking, including stalking. The company is reducing the default data retention period from 30 days to 7 days, with an "evidence mode" for longer storage in exceptional cases. Additionally, law enforcement agencies can now implement offense-based filters to restrict data access by other agencies, allowing cities to define permissible search categories like stolen vehicles or violent crimes. These changes aim to tighten oversight of the license-plate readers, which are marketed as crime-fighting tools but have faced criticism for potential mass surveillance.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedLaw enforcement agencies can now add offense-based filters to restrict cross-agency data access.
Flock is reducing the default data retention period for images from 30 days to 7 days.
Flock Safety has introduced stronger privacy protections for its automatic license-plate readers.
US police officers have been accused of using Flock's license-plate cameras for unauthorized tracking, including stalking.
Critics accuse Flock of operating a mass surveillance system with little oversight.