Does baseball need even more technology for plays like Pete Alonso’s disputed fly ball?
Following a disputed foul ball call on Pete Alonso's deep fly ball in a game between the Baltimore Orioles and New York Yankees, calls have emerged for Major League Baseball to implement more technology for plays near the foul pole. The call stood after review, with available video angles proving inconclusive.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedFollowing a disputed foul ball call on Pete Alonso's deep fly ball in a game between the Baltimore Orioles and New York Yankees, calls have emerged for Major League Baseball to implement more technology for plays near the foul pole. The call stood after review, with available video angles proving inconclusive. While players like Alonso advocate for advanced technology, MLB sources suggest that developing and implementing such systems, particularly for high fly balls where Hawk-Eye accuracy is limited, is not imminent. The league has been communicating with teams about such calls, but current technology struggles to definitively determine the ball's trajectory relative to the foul pole in these situations.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedOrioles manager Craig Albernaz stated that MLB communicated that there wasn't enough video evidence to overturn the call on the field.
The call led to outcry and calls for baseball to use technology to evaluate possible home runs near the foul pole.
Pete Alonso's deep fly ball was ruled foul, and the call stood after a review in Baltimore's 5-3 loss to the New York Yankees.
If baseball were to use additional technology on fly balls, it would have to be developed, tested, and installed by MLB.
Hawk-Eye data above the foul pole is unlikely to be accurate that far from the field due to estimation of the ball's path.