US judge questions the push to add Trump’s name back to the Kennedy Center

The venue’s board of directors, stacked with supporters of the president, voted to add his name again despite past ruling.A United States judge has questioned why the Kennedy Center is rushing to restore President Donald Trump’s name to the performing arts venue after it was ordered removed in a previous ruling.US District Court Judge Christopher Cooper asked Trump administration lawyer Bradley Mayers on Thursday why the venue has said it must begin adding the president’s name back to the building by September 8.Recommended Stories list of 3 itemslist 1 of 3Trump administration: Kennedy Center may be demolished if repairs not madelist 2 of 3Kennedy Center board says it won’t try to immediately restore Trump’s namelist 3 of 3Kennedy Center votes to restore Trump’s name to venue, close for two yearsend of list“What’s magic about that date?” Cooper asked.Mayers stated that the date is aligned with a vote by the centre’s board — composed of members selected by Trump, who then installed him as the head — earlier this month.“That’s all fine and good,” Cooper responded. “What does that have to do with what Congress intended in these statutes? That’s really what’s before me.”The legal saga around Trump’s effort to inscribe his name on the building of the John F Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, DC, is one of several examples of the president’s desire to reshape the landscape of the national capital.In addition to changes to the performing arts centre, Trump has demolished the East Wing of the White House and sought to replace it with an enormous ballroom.He also has pushed forward with plans for an enormous triumphal arch to be erected in a traffic circle not far from the historic Arlington National Cemetery.The president and his allies have faced numerous legal challenges to those efforts, with critics arguing that the projects require congressional approval.Previously, in May, Cooper found that the addition of Trump’s name to the building was illegal and that Congress alone could rebrand the building.