Federal appeals court panel gives Nevada a win in its fight to regulate prediction market Kalshi
A federal appeals court panel has ruled against prediction market operator Kalshi, allowing Nevada to continue its efforts to regulate the company's trading on sports and election events. The 9th U.S.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedA federal appeals court panel has ruled against prediction market operator Kalshi, allowing Nevada to continue its efforts to regulate the company's trading on sports and election events. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that federal commodities trading law likely does not preempt Nevada's state gambling laws, meaning the state can apply its regulations to Kalshi's sports event contracts. Nevada's attorney general's office hailed the decision as a victory for state authority. The court sent the issue of election contract trading back to a lower court. Kalshi stated it will seek further review, and trading on sports, entertainment, and elections remains blocked in Nevada.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedKalshi argued it is a “designated contract market” subject to federal regulation by the CFTC, not state gambling regulators.
Nevada’s attorney general’s office called the ruling a “major victory for Nevada and our longstanding authority to regulate gaming in our state.”
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that federal law likely does not preempt Nevada from applying its gambling regulations to Kalshi’s sports event contracts.
A federal appeals court panel refused to let prediction market operator Kalshi restart trading on sports and elections events in Nevada.
Roughly 20 states are involved in litigation over prediction markets like those run by Kalshi, Polymarket and Robin Hood.