Uber’s exits from
Nigeria and
Uganda highlight the growing challenges of making ride-hailing work in Africa.An
Uber car in
Nigeria, where rising fuel and vehicle-maintenance costs are pressuring ride-hailing drivers and the platforms they work for [File: Sodiq Adelakun/
Reuters]Published On 11 Sep 2026Abuja,
Nigeria –
Uber is leaving
Nigeria and
Uganda just as the cost of running a ride-hailing business is becoming harder to sustain in parts of Africa.The company ended its 12-year run in
Nigeria and about a decade in
Uganda on September 2 , saying the decision followed a “thorough review” of its business priorities and was limited to those countries.
Reuters reported that
Uber did not provide specific reasons for the
Nigeria exit.But the latest pullouts follow a series of exits from African markets. After six years in
Ivory Coast,
Uber left last year and ended its
Tanzania service in January this year after nearly a decade there.The closures do not point to a simple lack of demand. Instead, they highlight a harder calculation: whether platforms can keep fares affordable for passengers, whether drivers can earn enough to stay on the road and whether commissions are high enough to make the business worthwhile?
Nigeria provides the clearest example.Why did
Nigeria become so difficult for
Uber drivers?President
Bola Tinubu’s economic reforms, including the removal of the fuel subsidy and changes to the naira’s exchange-rate regime, have reshaped the cost of doing business in
Nigeria.For ride-hailing drivers, petrol, imported spare parts and vehicle maintenance have become more expensive, squeezing incomes at a time when fares remain under pressure.The frustration came to a head in March, when drivers working for
Uber, rivals
Bolt and
inDrive staged a three-day strike in
Lagos and Ogun over what they described as unsustainable fares and poor working conditions.
Uber driver Farouk Adebayo, who joined the strike in
Lagos, told
Al Jazeera how the economics had changed.“Since the government removed the subsidy, I have really been struggling with making a profit with
Uber the way I used to. When I add the cost of maintaining my car and everything else, the profit I was making from driving with
Uber was not worth it.”For drivers, the problem was not simply what
Uber charged. It was the accumulation of costs on top of the platform’s commission.Ayoade Ibrahim, co-founder and general secretary of the
Nigeria" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="202651" data-entity-type="organization">Amalgamated Union of App-Based Transporters of
Nigeria (AUATON), said drivers were being squeezed from several directions.“Talk to any driver and you hear the same arithmetic. The platform takes 25–30 percent commission. Then fuel. Then maintenance. Then insurance. Then the occasional fine. What remains is barely enough to feed a family, let alone save for the next repair. That is why so many drivers told us, as a union, that they had already migrated to
Bolt and
inDrive, or gone offline to negotiate cash trips simply to survive,” Ibrahim said.That shift matters because
Uber is competing not only for passengers, but also for drivers who can move between platforms.Who is challenging
Uber?
Bolt and
inDrive are major competitors in
Nigeria, alongside local platforms, such as Rida and LagRide.
inDrive allows passengers and drivers to negotiate fares, while its global model has generally involved a service fee of about 10 percent.
Uber’s exit from
Nigeria follows a series of withdrawals from African markets, including
Ivory Coast in 2025 and
Tanzania in January as the company takes a more selective approach to its operations on the continent [File: Sodiq Adelakun/
Reuters]For drivers, the ability to switch platforms, or leave them altogether, gives them an alternative when commissions or fares become unattractive.That makes the market harder for platforms to navigate as operating costs rise. A large customer base can generate plenty of rides without necessarily generating enough margin.Why does
Uganda look similar?
Uganda presents a different market but a familiar problem.The Smart Online Drivers Association resisted platform commissions in 2019 when it petitioned parliament over what it described as exploitative practices. Drivers were particularly concerned about
Uber’s 25 percent commission while fares remained low.
Bolt and SafeBoda were already established competitors in Kampala before
Uber’s departure. Smaller platforms, including Faras, Yango and Tinka, have increased the competition.
Uber entered the Ugandan market in 2016 and later launched UberBODA.The challenge, as in
Nigeria, is not necessarily finding passengers. It is keeping the three sides of the business, passengers, drivers and the platform satisfied enough for the model to remain viable.So why is
Uber staying elsewhere?
Uber has not said that
Nigeria or
Uganda were unprofitable, nor has it provided a detailed country-by-country explanation for the exits.Instead, it says it is focusing investment on markets where it can provide earning opportunities for drivers at scale and where riders can travel seamlessly. The company stressed that it remains committed to sub-Saharan Africa.Kenya shows why pulling out is not inevitable.In 2022, the Kenyan government introduced regulations to cap the commission of ride-hailing platforms at 18 percent.
Uber had been charging 25 percent and after driver protests, the company cut its commission to 18 percent.Rather than leave, the company changed the economics of its operation.That suggests
Uber’s calculation varies from market to market. Where it sees enough long-term value, it can respond to pressure by changing fares, commissions or other parts of its model. Where the economics no longer justify that investment, leaving becomes an option.
Nigeria has a huge population – 237 million – and substantial demand for urban transport.
Uganda has a growing urban market.
Tanzania and
Ivory Coast had their own opportunities.Yet market size alone is not enough.For ride-hailing platforms, the calculation is ultimately simple: passengers want affordable journeys, drivers need enough income to cover their costs and the company needs a commission large enough to sustain its service.When that balance breaks down, drivers look elsewhere, passengers follow cheaper options and the platform loses leverage.
Uber’s exits from
Nigeria and
Uganda, following the leaving of
Tanzania and
Ivory Coast, point to a more selective approach to Africa.For now,
Uber says it remains committed to the continent. But its future may increasingly depend not on how much demand it can find, but on which markets can make the economics work.For Ibrahim, the calculation ultimately comes back to the people behind the wheel.“
Uber’s model was built on independent contractors bearing almost all cash costs. In markets with stable fuel prices and accessible vehicle finance, that can work. In
Nigeria, where the cost of a full tank can swing tens of thousands of naira in a month, it does not. Drivers become the shock absorbers for the macroeconomy.”