US lawyer cites fake witnesses in murder case, blames ChatGPT
The New Mexico Supreme Court has fined and held attorney Stephen Aarons in contempt for submitting a court filing containing fabricated police testimony and witnesses generated by OpenAI's ChatGPT. The court stated the filing included false testimony from wholly fabricated witnesses and that Aarons failed to verify its accuracy.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedThe New Mexico Supreme Court has fined and held attorney Stephen Aarons in contempt for submitting a court filing containing fabricated police testimony and witnesses generated by OpenAI's ChatGPT. The court stated the filing included false testimony from wholly fabricated witnesses and that Aarons failed to verify its accuracy. Aarons explained he used ChatGPT to summarize trial proceedings and did not realize the extent of its potential to "hallucinate" facts, expressing remorse for what he called an honest mistake. The justices fined him $5,000 and will refer him to an attorney disciplinary board for investigation. This incident is one of several recent cases where lawyers have faced discipline for submitting AI-generated court documents without proper verification.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
4 extractedAarons stated he used ChatGPT to summarize trial proceedings and did not understand its potential to 'hallucinate' facts.
The New Mexico Supreme Court fined lawyer Stephen Aarons $5,000 and held him in contempt for failing to verify facts.
A defense lawyer submitted a brief containing made-up police testimony and witnesses fabricated by ChatGPT.
The court's sanction is one of a growing number of cases disciplining lawyers for submitting AI-generated documents without vetting.