NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence
SRCThe Guardian - World News
LANGEN
LEANCenter-Left
WORDS654
ENT11
WED · 2026-10-07 · 16:56 GMTBRIEF NSR-2026-1007-117122
News/Two men serving indefinite jail sentences freed after two de…
NSR-2026-1007-117122News Report·EN·Legal & Judicial

Two men serving indefinite jail sentences freed after two decades

Two men, Luke Ings and Liam Bennett, have been freed after serving approximately two decades in prison under Indeterminate Sentences for Public Protection (IPPs), despite having minimum terms of two years or less. A High Court judge and magistrate replaced their IPPs with fixed-term sentences after a review by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC).

Rajeev Syal Home affairs editorThe Guardian - World NewsFiled 2026-10-07 · 16:56 GMTLean · Center-LeftRead · 3 min
Two men serving indefinite jail sentences freed after two decades
The Guardian - World NewsFIG 01
Reading time
3min
Word count
654words
Sources cited
3cited
Entities identified
11entities
Quality score
100%
§ 01

Briefing Summary

AI-generated
NEWSAR · AI

Two men, Luke Ings and Liam Bennett, have been freed after serving approximately two decades in prison under Indeterminate Sentences for Public Protection (IPPs), despite having minimum terms of two years or less. A High Court judge and magistrate replaced their IPPs with fixed-term sentences after a review by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). A third man, James Ward, also had his indeterminate sentence replaced. The men successfully argued that their original sentences were wrongly imposed, with judges not properly considering their youth, maturity, or potential for change. IPP sentences, abolished in 2012, continue to affect over 2,000 prisoners who have served beyond their original tariffs.

Confidence 0.90Sources 3Claims 5Entities 11
§ 02

Article analysis

Model · rule-based
Framing
Legal & Judicial
Human Interest
Tone
Measured
AI-assessed
CalmNeutralAlarmist
Factuality
0.90 / 1.00
Factual
LowHigh
Sources cited
3
Well sourced
FewMany
§ 03

Key claims

5 extracted
01

James Ward was also in court and had his original sentence replaced; he was freed in 2017 after serving 10 years over his minimum term.

factual
Confidence
1.00
02

The men argued that judges had wrongly found them to be dangerous or had not considered alternative sentences.

factual
Confidence
1.00
03

Bennett and Ings were 17 when they committed offenses leading to indeterminate sentences with minimum terms of 24 and 21 months respectively.

factual
Confidence
1.00
04

The IPP sentences for Luke Ings and Liam Bennett were 'cancelled' by a high court judge.

quoteMr Justice Choudhury
Confidence
1.00
05

Two men serving indefinite sentences for public protection (IPPs) have been freed after serving about two decades in custody.

factual
Confidence
1.00
§ 04

Full report

3 min read · 654 words
Two men jailed with indefinite sentences for public protection (IPPs) have been freed after each serving about two decades in custody despite receiving minimum terms of two years or less.A high court judge and a magistrate hearing an appeal after a review by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) told Luke Ings and Liam Bennett they would be freed, and also replaced an indeterminate sentence given to a third man, James Ward.Ward, who was freed in 2017 after serving 10 years more than his one-year minimum and was later recalled to prison, was also in court, sitting in the public gallery to see his original sentence replaced.Relatives of Ings and Bennett hugged in the public gallery at Wolverhampton crown court on Wednesday as Mr Justice Choudhury told them the IPPs had been “cancelled”.Choudhury said Bennett would instead be sentenced to four years and 264 days, Ward to two years, and Ings to 42 months with a 30-month extended licence.All three men’s original sentences were quashed and replaced after they argued that judges had wrongly found them to be dangerous or had not considered alternative sentences.Choudhury, sitting with the magistrate Norma Grant, told the appellants: “You have already spent considerably longer than those [replacement] sentences in custody. The effect is that you, Mr Bennett, and you, Mr Ings, will be entitled to release without further supervision, and you, Mr Ward, will no longer be subject to supervision.”The ruling came after the CCRC referred the cases of the three men back to the crown court to review minimum terms imposed on them by judges in Wolverhampton, Reading and Leicester respectively in 2006 and 2007.Bennett and Ings, now both 38, were 17 when they committed offences that led to them being classed as dangerous offenders and given indeterminate sentences with respective minimum terms of 24 months and 21 months in 2007 and 2006.Bennett was originally sentenced at Wolverhampton crown court in May 2007 after being found guilty of reckless arson for setting fire to items in the loft space of an empty council property, and admitting criminal damage and burglary.Ings was sentenced to detention for public protection after appearing at East Berkshire youth court in March 2006 and admitting offences including a robbery in an underpass and an assault on a teenager in a fast food outlet.Ward, now 41, was 21 when he was given a one-year minimum sentence in 2006 at Leicester crown court for arson and criminal damage. He admitted arson – after setting fire to items in his prison cell while serving time for assault – and was released in 2017, but was later recalled to prison and remained in custody until August this year.Muin Boase, representing Bennett, successfully argued that the judge who sentenced him in 2007 did not give proper weight to his youth, lack of maturity and capacity to change after a difficult childhood.In its ruling, the appeal court said there had been no proper basis for the original finding of dangerousness.Detention for public protection and imprisonment for public protection (DPP and IPP) sentences were abolished in 2012, having been made available to tackle offenders considered a significant risk to the public in 2005.The law was changed to stop courts handing out IPP sentences after warnings that they were being applied too widely, but the abolition was not retrospective, meaning many prisoners serving such sentences are still behind bars.The government has faced calls to take action on IPP jail terms, with the former justice secretary Ken Clarke saying last month that ministers should not to be too cautious.His comments came a week after the current justice secretary, Alex Norris, told MPs that the government planned to bring forward legislation to end IPP sentences “once and for all” by the end of this parliament.More than 2,000 prisoners remain held indefinitely under IPP sentences, with 99% past their original tariff and 80% having served 10 years or more.Additional reporting by the Press Association
§ 05

Entities

11 identified
§ 06

Keywords & salience

9 terms
indefinite sentences
1.00
public protection sentences
1.00
criminal cases review commission
0.80
jail sentences
0.70
minimum terms
0.60
high court judge
0.60
custody
0.50
dangerous offenders
0.50
sentence replacement
0.40
§ 07

Topic connections

Interactive graph