US judge rules Trump administration’s use of voter data unlawful
A U.S. federal judge has ruled that the Justice Department unlawfully sought state voter rolls to cross-reference with a federal immigration database.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedA U.S. federal judge has ruled that the Justice Department unlawfully sought state voter rolls to cross-reference with a federal immigration database. U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan sided with watchdog group Common Cause, stating the administration understated the risk of wrongly removing eligible citizens due to inaccuracies in the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database. The judge determined this policy represented an attempt by the federal government to decide who gets to vote, an authority reserved for the states. The Justice Department is reviewing the ruling, while the ACLU noted the decision clarifies the administration cannot disrupt elections or endanger voters' rights. This ruling is a setback for President Trump's efforts to increase federal oversight of elections.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedThe Trump administration has repeatedly taken extreme measures to interfere with how elections are run.
The administration understated the risk of wrongly removing eligible citizens from voter rolls due to inaccuracies in the SAVE database.
A federal judge ruled the Justice Department unlawfully sought state voter rolls to cross-check against a federal immigration database.
The ruling marks a setback for President Donald Trump’s efforts to expand federal oversight of elections.
Research shows voter fraud is rare.