NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence
SRCThe Guardian - World News
LANGEN
LEANCenter-Left
WORDS666
ENT11
TUE · 2026-02-03 · 18:12 GMTBRIEF NSR-2026-0203-13055
News/US private investigator did ‘unlawful stuff’ for the Daily M…
NSR-2026-0203-13055News Report·EN·Legal & Judicial

US private investigator did ‘unlawful stuff’ for the Daily Mail, court hears

In a UK high court case, private investigator Daniel Portley-Hanks testified that he performed "unlawful stuff" for the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday between the early 1990s and around 2013, earning approximately $1 million. Portley-Hanks, also known as "Detective Danno," stated he gathered private information using names and phone numbers.

Michael Savage Media editorThe Guardian - World NewsFiled 2026-02-03 · 18:12 GMTLean · Center-LeftRead · 3 min
US private investigator did ‘unlawful stuff’ for the Daily Mail, court hears
The Guardian - World NewsFIG 01
Reading time
3min
Word count
666words
Sources cited
2cited
Entities identified
11entities
Quality score
100%
§ 01

Briefing Summary

AI-generated
NEWSAR · AI

In a UK high court case, private investigator Daniel Portley-Hanks testified that he performed "unlawful stuff" for the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday between the early 1990s and around 2013, earning approximately $1 million. Portley-Hanks, also known as "Detective Danno," stated he gathered private information using names and phone numbers. His testimony is part of a lawsuit brought by seven claimants, including Prince Harry and Elton John, who accuse Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL), publisher of the Daily Mail, of unlawful information gathering. Portley-Hanks alleged that ANL attempted to conceal the use of private investigators and that he was once part of a chain to pay a police officer for documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. ANL denies all allegations of wrongdoing.

Confidence 0.90Sources 2Claims 5Entities 11
§ 02

Article analysis

Model · rule-based
Framing
Legal & Judicial
Human Rights
Tone
Measured
AI-assessed
CalmNeutralAlarmist
Factuality
0.80 / 1.00
Factual
LowHigh
Sources cited
2
Limited
FewMany
§ 03

Key claims

5 extracted
01

ANL denies that its journalists engaged in wrongdoing.

factualANL
Confidence
1.00
02

Portley-Hanks said he carried out activities that are unlawful in the UK, including gathering personal data.

quotePortley-Hanks
Confidence
0.90
03

Daniel Portley-Hanks received about $1m for work carried out for the Mail on Sunday.

factualDaniel Portley-Hanks
Confidence
0.90
04

Portley-Hanks alleged that the publisher tried to conceal its continued use of private investigators.

factualPortley-Hanks
Confidence
0.80
05

Portley-Hanks said he did unlawful stuff on Prince Harry, but cannot recall what exactly.

quotePortley-Hanks
Confidence
0.70
§ 04

Full report

3 min read · 666 words
A US-based private detective bought a large house in California and had $150,000 in savings “almost entirely” from work he did for the publisher of the Daily Mail, the high court has heard.Daniel Portley-Hanks, also known as “Detective Danno”, said he received about $1m for work carried out for the Mail on Sunday, another title published by Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL).Giving evidence, Portley-Hanks said he went bankrupt after the publisher stopped using his services after the 2012 Leveson inquiry into the practices of the press. He said he had been told he could keep working for the publisher only if he gave up his private investigator’s licence.Portley-Hanks, 79, was giving evidence in a case brought by seven claimants, including Prince Harry, who accuse ANL of using unlawful information gathering techniques over decades.The other claimants are Elton John and his husband, David Furnish, the actors Elizabeth Hurley and Sadie Frost, the former Liberal Democrat MP Simon Hughes and the mother of Stephen Lawrence, Doreen Lawrence.Portley-Hanks said he worked for the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday from the early 1990s to around 2013. He said he was “the database guy”, stating: “All I needed was a name or a phone number and I could find a target’s contact and other private details, usually within minutes.”In court, Portley-Hanks said he did not believe anything he was doing was illegal “at the time”, but that he now believed he had carried out activities that are unlawful in the UK, including the gathering of personal data.This was challenged by ANL’s legal team, who pointed to his previous public statements stating he had not broken the law.ANL denies that its journalists engaged in wrongdoing. It has described all of the allegations of unlawful information gathering as “lurid” and “preposterous”.Portley-Hanks alleged that the publisher tried to conceal its continued use of private investigators by asking him to change his email address, to make it appear that he was a Hollywood reporter.He also alleged that on one occasion he was used as part of a chain to make a payment to a serving police officer for documents relating to Jeffrey Epstein. This is denied by ANL.While Portley-Hanks said he thought he carried out some work in relation to John, Hurley and Prince Harry, he said he could not remember anything specific.“I recall that I did stuff for the Mail on Sunday and Daily Mail in relation to Prince Harry,” he said in a written submission. “I know that I did unlawful stuff on him, but I cannot recall what exactly.“I also did stuff on Elton John. That was basically getting contact information for him and his boyfriend or significant other. I know that I did something involving Elizabeth Hurley, but I cannot recall what it was.”Portley-Hanks, who said he was in and out of jail when he was younger, was most recently imprisoned in 2017 in relation to his role with a violent gambling group.ANL’s legal team presented emails showing that a Mail editor had sought confirmation that Portley-Hanks was acting lawfully. In court, however, Portley-Hanks said he was also called at the same time and told to “agree to this, even though it wasn’t true”.In its written submissions, ANL said all its articles had been secured by lawful means. It said the “serious allegations, which are denied in their entirety, are unsupported by the available evidence”.The publisher said some journalists named in relation to Portley-Hanks had not heard of him until the case. Its legal team also said he was of “doubtful relevance” to the claimants’ case, given a lack of evidence connecting him to stories about them.There is uncertainty over whether a key figure in the trial will give evidence. Gavin Burrows, a private investigator who now states a previous admission of unlawful activity was a “forgery”, has said he is only willing to give evidence from a secret location.David Sherborne, acting for the claimants, told the court this was “highly unorthodox” and that it should not be allowed.The case continues.
§ 05

Entities

11 identified
§ 06

Keywords & salience

9 terms
private investigator
0.90
daily mail
0.80
unlawful information gathering
0.80
daniel portley-hanks
0.70
associated newspapers ltd
0.60
legal case
0.60
leveson inquiry
0.50
prince harry
0.50
personal data
0.40
§ 07

Topic connections

Interactive graph
Network visualization showing 11 related topics
View Full Graph
Person Organization Location Event|Click node to navigate|Edge numbers = shared articles