NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence
SRCThe Guardian - World News
LANGEN
LEANCenter-Left
WORDS611
ENT3
SAT · 2026-02-07 · 10:00 GMTBRIEF NSR-2026-0207-14200
News/Victims urge tougher action on deepfake abuse as new law com…
NSR-2026-0207-14200News Report·EN·Human Rights

Victims urge tougher action on deepfake abuse as new law comes into force

Victims of deepfake image abuse are advocating for stronger protections as a new law criminalizing the creation of non-consensual intimate images takes effect in the UK. Campaigners delivered a petition to Downing Street with over 73,000 signatures, urging the government to implement civil routes to justice, improved sex education, and funding for victim support services.

Priya BharadiaThe Guardian - World NewsFiled 2026-02-07 · 10:00 GMTLean · Center-LeftRead · 3 min
Victims urge tougher action on deepfake abuse as new law comes into force
The Guardian - World NewsFIG 01
Reading time
3min
Word count
611words
Sources cited
4cited
Entities identified
3entities
Quality score
100%
§ 01

Briefing Summary

AI-generated
NEWSAR · AI

Victims of deepfake image abuse are advocating for stronger protections as a new law criminalizing the creation of non-consensual intimate images takes effect in the UK. Campaigners delivered a petition to Downing Street with over 73,000 signatures, urging the government to implement civil routes to justice, improved sex education, and funding for victim support services. The law, an amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, was introduced after victims like "Jodie" faced difficulties seeking justice due to the absence of specific legislation. While the law received royal assent last July, its enforcement was delayed, frustrating campaigners who believe this resulted in more victims. Some argue the law doesn't adequately protect sex workers from intimate image abuse, as misuse of commercial sexual images is often treated only as a copyright breach.

Confidence 0.90Sources 4Claims 5Entities 3
§ 02

Article analysis

Model · rule-based
Framing
Human Rights
Legal & Judicial
Tone
Measured
AI-assessed
CalmNeutralAlarmist
Factuality
0.70 / 1.00
Factual
LowHigh
Sources cited
4
Well sourced
FewMany
§ 03

Key claims

5 extracted
01

The offence against creating explicit deepfake images was introduced as an amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025.

factual
Confidence
1.00
02

Alex Woolf was sentenced to 20 weeks in prison for posting deepfake images of women.

factual
Confidence
1.00
03

Campaigners delivered a petition to Downing Street with more than 73,000 signatures.

factual
Confidence
1.00
04

The law criminalising the creation of non-consensual intimate images comes into effect.

factual
Confidence
1.00
05

The delay has caused millions more women to become victims, and they won’t be able to get the justice they desperately want.

quoteJodie
Confidence
0.90
§ 04

Full report

3 min read · 611 words
Victims of deepfake image abuse have called for stronger protection against AI-generated explicit images, as the law criminalising the creation of non-consensual intimate images comes into effect.Campaigners from Stop Image-Based Abuse delivered a petition to Downing Street with more than 73,000 signatures, urging the government to introduce civil routes to justice such as takedown orders for abusive imagery on platforms and devices.“Today’s a really momentous day,” said Jodie, a victim of deepfake abuse who uses a pseudonym.“We’re really pleased the government has put these amendments into law that will definitely protect more women and girls. They were hard-fought victories by campaigners, particularly the consent-based element of it,” she added.In the petition, campaigners are also calling for improved relationships and sex education, as well as adequate funding for specialist services, such as the Revenge Porn Helpline, which support intimate image abuse victims.Jodie, who is in her 20s, discovered images of her being used as deepfake pornography in 2021. She and 15 other women testified against the perpetrator, 26-year-old Alex Woolf, after he posted images of women from social media to porn websites. He was convicted and sentenced to 20 weeks in prison.“I had a really difficult route to getting justice because there simply wasn’t a law that really covered what I felt had been done to me,” said Jodie.The offence against creating explicit deepfake images was introduced as an amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025. While the law received royal assent last July, the offence was not enforced until Friday.Many campaigners, including Jodie, were frustrated by delays to the law coming into effect. “We had these amendments ready to go with royal assent before Christmas,” said Jodie. “They should have brought them in immediately. The delay has caused millions more women to become victims, and they won’t be able to get the justice they desperately want.”In January, Leicestershire Police opened an investigation into a case involving sexually explicit deepfake images that were created by Grok AI.Madelaine Thomas, a sex worker and founder of tech forensics company Image Angel, who has waived her right to anonymity, said it was “a very emotional day” for her and other victims. However, she said the law falls short of protecting sex workers from intimate image abuse.“When commercial sexual images are misused, they’re only seen as a copyright breach. I respect that,” Thomas said. “However, the proportion of available responses doesn’t match the harm that occurs when you experience it. By discounting commercialised intimate image abuse, you are not giving people who are going through absolute hell the opportunity to get the help they need.”For the last seven years, intimate images of her have been shared without her consent almost every day. “When I first found out that my intimate images were shared, I felt suicidal, frankly, and it took a long time to recover from that.”One in three women in the UK have experienced online abuse, according to domestic abuse organisation Refuge.Stop Image-Based Abuse is a movement composed of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, the victim campaign group #NotYourPorn, Glamour UK and Clare McGlynn, a professor of law at Durham University.A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “Weaponising technology to target and exploit people is completely abhorrent. It’s already illegal to share intimate deepfakes – and as of yesterday, creating them is a criminal offence too.“But we’re not stopping there. We’re going after the companies behind these ‘nudification’ apps, banning them outright so we can stop this abuse at source.“The technology secretary has also confirmed that creating non-consensual sexual deepfakes will be made a priority offence under the Online Safety Act, placing extra duties on platforms to proactively prevent this content from appearing.”
§ 05

Entities

3 identified
Key playerOppositionContextPositiveNeutralNegative
§ 06

Keywords & salience

9 terms
deepfake abuse
1.00
intimate image abuse
0.90
non-consensual images
0.80
takedown orders
0.70
revenge porn
0.60
data (use and access) act 2025
0.50
civil routes to justice
0.50
sex education
0.50
stop image-based abuse
0.40
§ 07

Topic connections

Interactive graph