Hong Kong court rejects appeal in landmark subversion case
In February 2026, Hong Kong's Court of Appeal rejected appeals from eleven pro-democracy activists jailed in the "Hong Kong 47" subversion case. The case stems from an unofficial primary election held in July 2020, organized by the pro-democracy camp to select candidates for a legislative election.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedIn February 2026, Hong Kong's Court of Appeal rejected appeals from eleven pro-democracy activists jailed in the "Hong Kong 47" subversion case. The case stems from an unofficial primary election held in July 2020, organized by the pro-democracy camp to select candidates for a legislative election. Authorities deemed the primary a subversive plot under the Beijing-imposed national security law enacted in June 2020 following large-scale pro-democracy protests. Forty-five opposition figures were sentenced in 2024 for their involvement, receiving prison terms of four to ten years. The court also dismissed all appeals over sentences, while upholding the acquittal of one activist after a prosecution appeal.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedLawrence Lau, a pro-democracy former district councillor, was one of two activists acquitted in the case.
Eleven of the activists who appealed their convictions lost their bids on Monday.
Forty-five of the defendants were sentenced in 2024 to between four years and 10 years in prison.
The Hong Kong Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by jailed democracy campaigners in a subversion case.
Beijing imposed a sweeping national security law that snuffed out most dissent in the semi-autonomous city.