Minns government undermined own goal with NSW protest restrictions, constitutional challenge hears
Lawyers for three protest groups challenged a New South Wales anti-protest law in the NSW court of appeal on Thursday. The law, enacted by the Minns government after the Bondi terror attack, effectively banned marches in Sydney's CBD.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedLawyers for three protest groups challenged a New South Wales anti-protest law in the NSW court of appeal on Thursday. The law, enacted by the Minns government after the Bondi terror attack, effectively banned marches in Sydney's CBD. The challenge argues the law undermines its own stated objective of enhancing social cohesion. The protest groups' lawyers contend the state must prove preventing all protests was a rational means to achieve social cohesion. The constitutional challenge aims to overturn the law, arguing it is overly broad and infringes on the right to protest.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
4 extractedThe anti-protest law was passed in the wake of the Bondi terror.
The NSW court of appeal heard a constitutional challenge against the anti-protest law.
Lawyer argues state needs to prove it was ‘rational to prevent all protests’ to achieve social cohesion
Lawyers for protest groups argue a Minns government law banning marches in Sydney’s CBD made social cohesion “worse”.