NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence
SRCThe Guardian - World News
LANGEN
LEANCenter-Left
WORDS692
ENT10
TUE · 2026-03-03 · 11:35 GMTBRIEF NSR-2026-0303-20965
News/OpenAI amends Pentagon deal as Sam Altman admits it looks ‘s…
NSR-2026-0303-20965News Report·EN·Technology

OpenAI amends Pentagon deal as Sam Altman admits it looks ‘sloppy’

OpenAI is amending its agreement to provide AI to the US Department of War (DoW) after CEO Sam Altman acknowledged the deal appeared "opportunistic and sloppy." The original contract, made shortly after Anthropic was dropped as the Pentagon's AI contractor, raised concerns about potential domestic mass surveillance. Altman stated OpenAI's technology would be explicitly barred from surveillance and use by intelligence agencies like the NSA.

Dan Milmo and Robert BoothThe Guardian - World NewsFiled 2026-03-03 · 11:35 GMTLean · Center-LeftRead · 3 min
OpenAI amends Pentagon deal as Sam Altman admits it looks ‘sloppy’
The Guardian - World NewsFIG 01
Reading time
3min
Word count
692words
Sources cited
6cited
Entities identified
10entities
Quality score
100%
§ 01

Briefing Summary

AI-generated
NEWSAR · AI

OpenAI is amending its agreement to provide AI to the US Department of War (DoW) after CEO Sam Altman acknowledged the deal appeared "opportunistic and sloppy." The original contract, made shortly after Anthropic was dropped as the Pentagon's AI contractor, raised concerns about potential domestic mass surveillance. Altman stated OpenAI's technology would be explicitly barred from surveillance and use by intelligence agencies like the NSA. The deal sparked online backlash and calls to boycott ChatGPT, while competitor Anthropic's chatbot, Claude, gained popularity. Altman admitted the announcement was rushed and lacked clear communication, despite OpenAI's claim of having stricter safeguards than previous agreements. The use of AI by the US military has raised concerns among employees at OpenAI and Google, who are urging their companies to refuse its use for surveillance and autonomous killing.

Confidence 0.90Sources 6Claims 5Entities 10
§ 02

Article analysis

Model · rule-based
Framing
Technology
National Security
Tone
Mixed Tone
AI-assessed
CalmNeutralAlarmist
Factuality
0.70 / 1.00
Factual
LowHigh
Sources cited
6
Well sourced
FewMany
§ 03

Key claims

5 extracted
01

Nearly 900 employees at OpenAI and Google signed an open letter.

statisticArticle
Confidence
1.00
02

Anthropic insisted using AI for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values.

quoteAnthropic
Confidence
1.00
03

OpenAI will bar its technology from being used for domestic mass surveillance.

factualSam Altman
Confidence
1.00
04

Sam Altman admitted the deal looked 'opportunistic and sloppy'.

quoteSam Altman
Confidence
1.00
05

OpenAI is amending its deal to supply AI to the US Department of War.

factualArticle
Confidence
1.00
§ 04

Full report

3 min read · 692 words
OpenAI is amending its hastily arranged deal to supply artificial intelligence to the US Department of War (DoW) after the ChatGPT owner’s chief executive admitted it looked “opportunistic and sloppy”.The contract prompted fears the San Francisco startup’s AI could be used for domestic mass surveillance but its boss, Sam Altman, said on Monday night the startup would explicitly bar its technology from being used for that purpose or being deployed by defence department intelligence agencies such as the National Security Agency (NSA).OpenAI, which has more than 900 million users of ChatGPT, made the deal almost immediately after the Pentagon’s existing AI contractor, Anthropic, was dropped.Anthropic had insisted “using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values”, leading the US president, Donald Trump, to call Anthropic “leftwing nut jobs” and directing the federal government to stop using its technology.Despite denials from OpenAI that the agreement allowed for surveillance use, commentators raised the spectre of the Snowden scandal, which broke in 2013, when it emerged the NSA was engaged in mass harvesting of phone and internet communications.The deal prompted an online backlash against OpenAI, with users of X and Reddit encouraging a “delete ChatGPT” campaign. One post read: “You’re now training a war machine. Let’s see proof of cancellation.”Claude, the chatbot made by Anthropic, jumped to the top of Apple’s App Store charts, rising above ChatGPT, according to analysis by Sensor Tower.In a message to employees reposted on X, the OpenAI CEO said the original deal announced on Friday had been struck too quickly after Anthropic was dropped.“We shouldn’t have rushed to get this out on Friday,” Altman wrote. “The issues are super complex, and demand clear communication. We were genuinely trying to de-escalate things and avoid a much worse outcome, but I think it just looked opportunistic and sloppy.”Upon announcing the deal, OpenAI had said the contract had “more guardrails than any previous agreement for classified AI deployments, including Anthropic’s”.However, the use of AI by the US military has alarmed nearly 900 employees at OpenAI and Google, also a leading power in the technology, who have signed an open letter calling on their bosses to refuse to let the DoW use their products for surveillance and autonomous killing.Warning that the US government was trying to “divide each company with fear that the other will give in”, they wrote: “We hope our leaders will put aside their differences and stand together to continue to refuse the DoW’s current demands for permission to use our models for domestic mass surveillance and autonomously killing people without human oversight.”The letter has been signed by 796 Google employees and 98 OpenAI staff. OpenAI said in a blogpost announcing the DoW deal that one of its red lines was “no use of OpenAI technology to direct autonomous weapons systems”.However, observers including OpenAI’s former head of policy research, Miles Brundage, have queried how OpenAI has managed to secure a deal that assuages ethical concerns Anthropic believed were insurmountable. Posting on X, he wrote: “OpenAI employees’ default assumption here should unfortunately be that OpenAI caved + framed it as not caving, and screwed Anthropic while framing it as helping them.”Brundage added: “To be clear, OAI is a complex org, and I think many people involved in this worked hard for what they consider a fair outcome. Some others I do not trust at all, particularly as it relates to dealings with government and politics.”In his X post, he also wrote that he would “rather go to jail” than follow an unconstitutional order from the government.“We want to work through democratic processes,” Brundage wrote. “It should be the government making the key decisions about society. We want to have a voice, and a seat at the table where we can share our expertise, and to fight for principles of liberty.”Meanwhile, three more US cabinet-level agencies – the departments of state, Treasury and health and human services – have moved to cease use of Anthropic’s AI products after the DoW’s declaration of the company as a supply chain risk. Trump has ordered all US government agencies to phase out their use of Anthropic after secretary of defence Pete Hegseth’s decision.
§ 05

Entities

10 identified
§ 06

Keywords & salience

10 terms
openai
1.00
artificial intelligence
0.90
department of war
0.80
mass surveillance
0.80
sam altman
0.70
anthropic
0.70
ai ethics
0.60
chatgpt
0.60
defense technology
0.50
government contract
0.40
§ 07

Topic connections

Interactive graph
Network visualization showing 51 related topics
View Full Graph
Person Organization Location Event|Click node to navigate|Edge numbers = shared articles