Mourners chant slogans during a memorial rally held by supporters of
Lebanon’s Shia Muslim
Hezbollah movement a day after
Iran’s supreme leader was assassinated during a US and Israeli offensive on Tehran, in
Beirut’s southern suburbs on March 1, 2026 [AFP]Published On 3 Mar 2026Beirut,
Lebanon –
Hezbollah raised the stakes for the Lebanese government on Tuesday, when it launched an attack on
Israel’s Ramat Airbase and a barrage of rockets another military facility in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, a day after Prime Minister
Nawaf Salam’s cabinet announced a ban on
Hezbollah’s military and security activities.Analysts said that the Lebanese government’s decision, while difficult to implement, might have a decisive impact on the future of
Lebanon. Some say it was a necessary step to bring decisions related to security and defence under the central government’s control, while others argue it raises the spectre of internal strife.
Imad Salamey, a political scientist at the Lebanese American University, said that implementation of the government’s decision to disarm
Hezbollah was “more plausible today than in previous years because the decision reflects unusually broad national backing, including from within the Shia political sphere”.“Amal’s vote in favour signals that support for consolidating arms under state authority is no longer framed purely as a sectarian or anti-resistance demand, but increasingly as a state-stabilisation necessity – especially amid economic collapse and regional escalation,” he said, referring to the other Lebanese Shia Muslim group headed by Parliament Speaker
Nabih Berri.But Michael Young, a
Lebanon expert at the Carnegie Middle East Center, said the decision was easier said than done.“Implementation is going to he much more complicated. The army is not enthusiastic to enter into a fight with
Hezbollah,” Young told Al Jazeera.“It’s good that the state has taken this decision, but it is not good that the army seems very reluctant to implement this decision,” he added.The
Iran-backed
Hezbollah effectively joined the war that the
United States and
Israel started against
Iran on Saturday when it launched a barrage of rockets and drones towards northern
Israel on Monday, saying it was acting to avenge the killing of
Iran’s Supreme Leader
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in Tehran and
Israel’s near-daily attacks on
Lebanon.
Israel responded by hitting
Beirut’s southern suburbs with loud attacks that woke many of the city’s residents up, and issued evacuation warnings for more than 50 towns, displacing tens of thousands of people from their homes.
Hezbollah’s military actions bannedAs this unfolded, Salam’s cabinet met and debated the events before the prime minister called an emergency news conference.“We announce a ban on
Hezbollah’s military activities and restrict its role to the political sphere,” Salam said in a news conference on Monday after the meeting.“We declare our rejection of any military or security operations launched from Lebanese territory outside the framework of legitimate institutions.”Lebanese Prime Minister
Nawaf Salam speaks to journalists at the government headquarters in
Beirut,
Lebanon, December 3, 2025 [Mohamed Azakir/Reuters]He added that all of
Hezbollah’s military or security activities are “illegal” and said security forces would “prevent any attacks originating from Lebanese territory” against
Israel or other states.“We declare our commitment to the cessation of hostilities and the resumption of negotiations,” he said.The statement was the strongest stance against
Hezbollah to date and even gained the support of Parliament Speaker, and longtime staunch
Hezbollah ally,
Nabih Berri, who leads the
Amal Movement.Justice Minister Adel Nassar, meanwhile, ordered the arrest of the people who ordered the attack.A ‘landmark’ decisionHezbollah has been
Lebanon’s strongest political and military force for decades. But the 2023-2024 war with
Israel devastated the group.
Hezbollah lost the majority of its military leadership, including longtime Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah.Since the end of that war, a debate over
Hezbollah’s weapons and role has ensued. Salam’s government has promised to disarm
Hezbollah, while the group itself only accepted giving up its arms south of the Litani River that cuts across southern
Lebanon.Despite a November 2024 ceasefire agreement,
Israel continued to attack south and east
Lebanon almost daily. But since
Hezbollah’s retaliation,
Israel has started bombing
Beirut’s suburbs again. On Monday alone,
Israel killed more than 52 people, wounded more than 150 others, struck targets all over
Lebanon, and gave evacuation orders for more than 50 Lebanese towns.While
Hezbollah’s first attack on
Israel in over a year took many by surprise,
Israel’s violent response did not.Critics of
Hezbollah pointed out that the group had acted recklessly and gave
Israel an excuse to unleash its fury on
Lebanon.
Israel has also spoken about a potential ground invasion.For analysts, the Lebanese government’s decision was a clear indication of how far the group has fallen since 2024.“The government’s decision to officially ban all
Hezbollah activities represents a landmark shift in the position of the government toward disarming
Hezbollah,” Dania Arayssi, a senior analyst at New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy, told Al Jazeera. “This is a further reaffirmation that
Hezbollah has lost a lot, if not all, its political power and influence in the Lebanese government.”Arayssi said
Hezbollah’s diminished status since 2024 also meant that the likelihood of a clash between the group and the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) was minimal.“I don’t think there is a possibility of this leading to internal strife,” she said.
Hezbollah challenges Salam’s governmentHezbollah did not welcome the announcement.The head of
Hezbollah’s Parliamentary Bloc, Mohammad Raad, dispelled rumours of his assassination on Monday evening when he released a statement dismissing the government’s decision.“We see no justification for Prime Minister Salam and his government to take bombastic decisions against Lebanese citizens who reject the occupation and accuse them of violating the peace that the enemy itself has denied and refused to uphold for a year and four months,” Raad said in a statement. “[
Israel] has imposed a state of daily war on the Lebanese people.”“The Lebanese were expecting a decision to ban aggression, but instead they are faced with a decision to ban the rejection of aggression,” Raad added.Jawad Salhab, a political researcher and analyst, called the government’s move “a grave betrayal of the Lebanese people and a grave betrayal of the Lebanese state, whose sovereignty has been violated for 15 months.”“Fifteen months of strategic patience have cost us more than 500 martyrs, while this Zionist enemy has persisted in its aggression against
Lebanon and its sovereignty by air, land, and sea,” he said.Overnight on Monday, leading into Tuesday,
Israel struck targets around
Lebanon, including the southern suburbs of the capital
Beirut. In one strike,
Israel targeted al-Manar,
Hezbollah’s television station.Then, on Tuesday morning,
Hezbollah attacked
Israel again, in what will be interpreted as a clear challenge to Salam’s announcement.The Lebanese army had been tasked with an earlier government decision to disarm
Hezbollah and said in January that it completed the first phase south of the Litani River. But
Hezbollah has refused to move along with phase two, set to take place between the Litani and the Awali River, which is near the city of Sidon.Nicholas Blanford, a nonresident senior fellow with the US-based Atlantic Council, told Al Jazeera that the government’s move was a “bold step” but one that might be difficult to enforce.