ICC rejects bias claims from stranded South Africa, West Indies cricketers
Following the T20 World Cup in March 2026, the ICC faced accusations of bias after the West Indies and South Africa squads were stranded in India for over a week, while the England team departed within two days. The travel disruptions stemmed from airspace closures and rerouted flights due to conflict in the Middle East.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedFollowing the T20 World Cup in March 2026, the ICC faced accusations of bias after the West Indies and South Africa squads were stranded in India for over a week, while the England team departed within two days. The travel disruptions stemmed from airspace closures and rerouted flights due to conflict in the Middle East. Players expressed frustration over the delays and lack of communication. Cricket West Indies reported their squad waited nine days for a repeatedly delayed charter flight. The ICC denied preferential treatment, citing safety, feasibility, and welfare as the driving factors behind travel decisions. They stated that arrangements were being made for the remaining West Indies players to depart India.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedNine West Indies players and staff members were already travelling to the Caribbean.
West Indies squad had waited nine days for a charter flight that was repeatedly delayed.
The ICC rejects any suggestion that these decisions have been driven by anything other than safety, feasibility and welfare.
England flew out of India in less than two days.
West Indies and South Africa squads were stranded in India for more than a week after the T20 World Cup.