The risks of embracing Trump in
Peru's presidential electionUS President
Donald Trump has sought greater influence over
Latin America. But in
Peru's election, will embracing Trump pay off — or alienate voters?Supporters of presidential candidate
Rafael Lopez Aliaga gather for his closing campaign rally in
Lima on April 9 [AFP]Supporters of presidential candidate
Rafael Lopez Aliaga gather for his closing campaign rally in
Lima on April 9 [AFP]Published On 10 Apr 2026Lima,
Peru – A record 35 candidates are vying for the presidency in
Peru on Sunday. Only one, however, pitched himself as the most pro-
Donald Trump option.
Rafael Lopez Aliaga, a chubby-cheeked business magnate and former mayor who goes by the nickname "Porky", had been the race’s frontrunner since August.He ran a far-right campaign, expressing support for the
United States bombing of alleged drug-smuggling boats and proposing that the US military intervene in
Peru to capture gang leaders.Lopez Aliaga even bragged about his ties to the Trump administration. He claimed that US Secretary of State
Marco Rubio invited him to Trump's inauguration last year, and in October, he organised a memorial for
Charlie Kirk, despite only learning about the Trump-aligned activist after his assassination.But ahead of the vote on Sunday, Lopez Aliaga has little to show for those efforts.He has fallen to just 7 percent of voter intent, with his right-wing rival
Keiko Fujimori overtaking him by eight points, according to an
Ipsos poll released a week before the vote.Fujimori's platform bears no mention of Trump's ambitions in
Latin America. It says that, if Fujimori is elected, her foreign policy would be “based exclusively on national interest".With more than 20 percent of voters still undecided, the race is still wildly unpredictable. But most political analysts no longer expect Lopez Aliaga to move on to a likely June run-off between the top two presidential candidates.That has raised questions about limitations, and potential risks, of embracing the Trump brand in
Peru and in
Latin America overall.“Trump's far-right admirers are no doubt questioning the mileage in his coattails,” said
Benjamin Gedan, the director of the
Latin America programme at the
Stimson Center, a foreign affairs think tank.Gedan believes that Trump’s aggressive foreign policy has diminished his appeal in the region.He pointed to Trump's embrace of the 19th-century Monroe Doctrine — a policy that claims all of the Western Hemisphere as the US's sphere of influence — as one of his more controversial stances.“Trump is not popular in
Latin America, and the Monroe Doctrine and war in Iran will not improve his image,” Gedan said.Supporters of
Rafael Lopez Aliaga display his emblem, the cartoon character Porky Pig, at a campaign rally in
Lima on April 4 [Angela Ponce/Reuters]Supporters of
Rafael Lopez Aliaga display his emblem, the cartoon character Porky Pig, at a campaign rally in
Lima on April 4 [Angela Ponce/Reuters]This year, the share of Peruvians who distrust the US government rose to 48 percent, more than double the portion in 2019, according to polling by the Institute of Peruvian Studies (IEP).That puts wariness of the US 13 points higher than concerns about its rival, China, whose influence Trump has sought to curtail in
Latin America.But
Peru’s election is far from a referendum on Trump, who has yet to endorse Lopez Aliaga or any other candidate.In fact, the US president has been largely ignored in the race, which has focused on domestic issues.During
Peru's six presidential debates, Trump only came up once, when a candidate criticised his tariff hikes.Alberto Rojas, 46, a mechanic in
Lima who is leaning towards Fujimori, indicated that Trump's absence from the debates was fine by him.The US president, he added, is a “madman” whom
Peru would do best to avoid.“We have enough problems as it is,” Rojas said, listing crime and corruption as his top concerns. “A president from another country isn’t going to save us. He might even make things worse.”Peruvian political analyst Gonzalo Banda said he was surprised that foreign policy — and relations with the US in particular — did not emerge as an election issue at all this year.After all, under Trump, the US has become more active in
Latin America than it has been in decades. Recent scandals have also raised questions about US influence in
Peru.Media reports, for instance, have questioned why the Peruvian government nixed plans to buy two dozen Swedish Gripen fighter jets, opting instead for US-made F-16s, even though they cost nearly twice as much per unit.“A good left-wing candidate would have made that a campaign issue,” said Banda.“Because there’s a very practical argument. Basically, ‘Hey, why do we have to buy worse planes that are much more expensive from the
United States?'"Presidential candidate Roberto Sanchez arrives at his closing campaign rally in
Lima,
Peru, on April 8 [Bruno Elias/AP Photo]Presidential candidate Roberto Sanchez arrives at his closing campaign rally in
Lima,
Peru, on April 8 [Bruno Elias/AP Photo]Some left-wing candidates have touched upon Trump's growing involvement in
Latin America.For instance, the party platform for Roberto Sanchez, a far-left candidate who surged in the polls in recent weeks, denounces the US for trying to “forcibly implement the Monroe Doctrine and brazenly claim that the riches of
Latin America are its own".But Sanchez himself has not made the issue a central part of his campaign speeches, focusing his attacks on local elites instead.Still,
Peru has been among the countries Trump has tried to push away from China's influence. The country is
Latin America's second-largest recipient of Chinese foreign direct investment, after Brazil.In February, the Trump administration publicly accused
Peru of surrendering its sovereignty by allowing a Chinese company to build and operate a mega-port on its coast."Let this be a cautionary tale for the region and the world: cheap Chinese money costs sovereignty," the US Department of State wrote in a social media post.
Peru also continues to be the world’s second-largest producer of cocaine, at a time when Trump has led a militaristic campaign against illicit drug-trafficking.But some Peruvian voters have expressed empathy for Trump's hardline approach.Mariana Caballero, a 33-year-old office worker, said Trump was brave for taking on thorny issues like Venezuelan immigration and drug trafficking, which also affect
Peru.“Trump is the most powerful man in the world, and he’s changing the world,” Caballero said.She then drew a parallel between Trump and the candidate she plans to vote for, Lopez Aliaga. “We’d be foolish to not take advantage of a leader like Rafael," she added.Some of
Peru's 35 presidential candidates wave to reporters at a presidential debate in
Lima on March 30 [Guadalupe Pardo/AP Photo]Some of
Peru's 35 presidential candidates wave to reporters at a presidential debate in
Lima on March 30 [Guadalupe Pardo/AP Photo]Support for democracy has declined in
Peru, which has seen chronic upheaval in its government.In the past decade, there have been nine presidents, many of whom stepped down or were impeached due to corruption charges.According to the Institute of Peruvian Studies, nearly half of the country's voters want a candidate who will usher in big changes to the government.But that push for change does not necessarily mean they want a candidate beholden to Trump. Even Lopez Aliaga has pumped the brakes on praising Trump in recent months, rarely mentioning him at all.Eduardo Dargent, a political scientist at the Pontifical Catholic University of
Peru (PUCP), said the shift likely reflected concerns that a pro-Trump stance was no longer a net positive.“Using Trump can be very dangerous for a candidate in
Peru, especially if tomorrow Trump attacks
Peru over its close ties with China,” said Dargent. “It creates a lot of risk, and you don't know how it will turn out.”It wouldn’t be the first time that Lopez Aliaga has put distance between himself and the US leader. During his first presidential bid in 2021, Lopez Aliaga rejected the notion that he was the “Peruvian Trump”, telling a local newspaper that the then-former US president was “a very disrespectful, intolerant person".Still, Lopez Aliaga began and ended his current campaign on a firmly pro-Trump footing.On April 3, with barely a week left before the general election, Lopez Aliaga posted on social media that one of his first moves as president would be to join the Shield of the Americas, a Trump-led coalition focused on fighting organised crime.Banda, the political analyst, compared Lopez Aliaga's post to the cry of a drowning man shouting, “Save me!”“It’s an act of desperation,” said Banda. “Right when the campaign enters its decisive phase and he starts to lose popularity, he returns to Trump as a symbolic shortcut, not to broaden his coalition but to reactivate an emotionally aligned core group.”Presidential candidate
Rafael Lopez Aliaga arrives at a campaign rally in the town of Huaycan outside
Lima,
Peru, on March 18 [Martin Mejia/AP Photo]Presidential candidate
Rafael Lopez Aliaga arrives at a campaign rally in the town of Huaycan outside
Lima,
Peru, on March 18 [Martin Mejia/AP Photo]If Lopez Aliaga was angling for a last-minute Trump endorsement, it has yet to come. It is also unclear if it would help.More than 60 percent of Peruvians said Trump’s endorsement would matter little to nothing when deciding who to vote for, according to a March poll.In countries where Trump has thrown his support behind a presidential candidate, the results have been mixed.According to the
Stimson Center's Gedan, Trump’s endorsement of President Javier Milei's party in Argentina's midterm elections likely helped because of the $20bn bailout that came with it.But his impact on the Honduras election was harder to detect, and his 2022 backing of Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil likely backfired, Gedan added.Brayan Ramirez, a university student and undecided voter in
Lima, was among the Peruvians who indicated they would react negatively to Trump's endorsement.“If Trump says, ‘
Peru, vote for this candidate,’ I’d vote against" them, said Ramirez.“Because he wouldn’t do it for nothing. He’s looking out for his own interests. Each country has to look out for its own interests.”