Judge dismisses Trump’s $10B lawsuit against WSJ, Murdoch over reporting on ties to Epstein

Judge dismisses Trump’s $10B lawsuit against WSJ, Murdoch over reporting on ties to Epstein 1 of 2 | President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before departing on Marine One from the South Lawn of the White House, Saturday, April 11, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) 2 of 2 | Rupert Murdoch sits in the Oval Office of the White House as President Donald Trump signs an executive order, Feb. 3, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) 1 of 2 President Donald Trump speaks with reporters before departing on Marine One from the South Lawn of the White House, Saturday, April 11, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) Add AP News on Google Add AP News as your preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. 2 of 2 Rupert Murdoch sits in the Oval Office of the White House as President Donald Trump signs an executive order, Feb. 3, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File) Add AP News on Google Add AP News as your preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. Updated [hour]:[minute] [AMPM] [timezone], [monthFull] [day], [year] Washington (AP) — A federal judge dismissed President Donald Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch on Monday over a story on his ties to Jeffrey Epstein.U.S. District Judge Darrin P. Gayles in Florida wrote in the order that Trump had failed to make the argument that the article was published with the intent to be malicious, but gave the president a chance to file an amended complaint.Trump filed the lawsuit in July, following up on a promise to sue the paper almost immediately after it put a new spotlight on his well-documented relationship with Epstein by publishing an article that described a sexually suggestive letter that the newspaper said bore Trump’s signature and was included in a 2003 album compiled for Epstein’s 50th birthday. The letter was subsequently released publicly by Congress, which subpoenaed the records from Epstein’s estate. Trump denied writing it, calling the story “false, malicious, and defamatory.” Attorneys for the newspaper and Murdoch had asked Gayles to rule that the article’s statements were true and therefore couldn’t be defamatory, but the judge wrote that “whether President Trump was the author of the Letter or Epstein’s friend are questions of fact that cannot be determined at this stage of the litigation,” Gayles wrote. The ruling marks yet another blow in the Trump administration’s efforts to manage fallout over its release of the Epstein files and the president’s attempts to use the legal system to chill reporting he finds critical of him.Neither the White House nor a spokesperson for Dow Jones, which publishes the Journal, immediately responded to requests for comment.___Meg Kinnard can be reached at http://x.com/MegKinnardAP