‘Mineral’ sunscreens marketed to Australians contain almost identical chemicals as others, testing shows
Researchers at the University of New South Wales' school of chemistry tested 10 sunscreens, including Invisible Zinc children's sunscreen and Naked Sundays skin tint, to determine their chemical composition. The results showed that products marketed as "mineral" sunscreens contained almost identical chemicals found in cheaper alternatives.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedResearchers at the University of New South Wales' school of chemistry tested 10 sunscreens, including Invisible Zinc children's sunscreen and Naked Sundays skin tint, to determine their chemical composition. The results showed that products marketed as "mineral" sunscreens contained almost identical chemicals found in cheaper alternatives. The testing revealed that these products offered similar levels of protection against UV radiation. The study aimed to inform consumers about the potential lack of difference between premium and affordable sunscreen options. The findings suggest that Australian consumers may be paying a premium for products that offer minimal additional benefits over cheaper alternatives. The research highlights the need for clearer labeling and more transparent product claims in the sunscreen market.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedNaked Sundays skin tint retails for $58 and is marketed as a mineral sunscreen.
Invisible Zinc children’s sunscreen is marketed as a mineral sunscreen.
UNSW researchers tested 10 sunscreens.
“Mineral” sunscreens contain almost identical chemicals to cheaper varieties.
Australian consumers are paying a premium for “mineral” sunscreens.