How Hong Kong can actively shape the foreign policy debate
Professor Jinghan Zeng, a professor at City University of Hong Kong, argues that despite being a globally connected and intellectually vibrant city, Hong Kong remains structurally peripheral in international relations. Despite hosting internationally trained scholars and contributing to global debates through research, the city lacks a strong presence in shaping foreign policy discussions.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedProfessor Jinghan Zeng, a professor at City University of Hong Kong, argues that despite being a globally connected and intellectually vibrant city, Hong Kong remains structurally peripheral in international relations. Despite hosting internationally trained scholars and contributing to global debates through research, the city lacks a strong presence in shaping foreign policy discussions. A year ago, Professor Zeng returned to Asia after working for the United Nations in New York City, expecting Hong Kong to be a leading hub for international relations. However, he notes that Hong Kong's universities host talented scholars and contribute to global debates, but their research is often overlooked. This structural issue hinders Hong Kong's ability to actively shape foreign policy debates, despite its status as a "superconnector" between China and the world.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
3 extractedHong Kong’s universities host internationally trained scholars, regional security and Asia-focused area studies.
Hong Kong remains a paradox: globally connected, intellectually vibrant but structurally peripheral in international relations.
Hong Kong is often described as a “superconnector” between China and the world.