Neo-Nazi group told by AEC it can’t become a political party while it hides identities of members

The AEC says the group’s application to become a political party would be invalid because it does not contain the required details of its members. Photograph: Rick Rycroft/AP View image in fullscreen The AEC says the group’s application to become a political party would be invalid because it does not contain the required details of its members. Photograph: Rick Rycroft/AP Neo-Nazi group told by AEC it can’t become a political party while it hides identities of members Australia" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="127332" data-entity-type="organization">White Australia group says it does not want to ‘doxx’ members as it challenges designation as banned hate group Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast A Neo-Nazi group has been told it cannot become a political party if it continues to redact the names of its potential members, as it launches a legal challenge to being designated as a banned hate group. The Australia" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="127332" data-entity-type="organization">White Australia party, also known as the National Socialist Network, and its national president Thomas Sewell launched a constitutional challenge in the Australia" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="45857" data-entity-type="organization">High Court of Australia on Friday against the ban by the Federal Government. In a cover letter sent to the Australia-electoral-commission" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="130843" data-entity-type="organization">Australia Electoral Commission (AEC) on 25 April as part of its application to form a political party, the group said it intentionally provided a redacted list of 1,779 members to protect members’ identification. The group said it plans to submit its membership details – and progress its application – pending a decision by the high court, with a spokesperson saying it did not want to “doxx” its members. The group has requested a court order to prevent the commonwealth from taking any action against the group while the constitutional challenge is under way. The AEC has made a preliminary decision, and told the group its application would be invalid, due to not submitting details of its members. But electoral rules mean a formal decision on the group application will not be made until July. The listing is separate to the AEC’s process. “The AEC’s preliminary view, which has been communicated to the applicant, is that the application does not contain the necessary elements to be valid,” an AEC spokesperson said. “A formal determination cannot be made until the return of the Farrer byelection. Once the writ is returned, the outcome of a formal assessment will be communicated to the applicant.” The AEC communicated to the group that for its application to proceed after the writs were returned, it would need to include all the contact details of its members. Under the electoral act, the commission is unable to formally register or reject the registration of a political party during the period between the issuing of the writs and the return for a Senate or House of Representatives election. The writs for the Farrer byelection, held on 9 May, are due to be returned before 10 July. The group could ask for a review of the formal decision within 28 days of it being made. A party must submit between 1,500 and 1,650 members to the AEC to be registered, with each member’s contact details as they appear on the electoral roll – which the commission verifies. The Neo-Nazi group’s solicitor, Matthew Hopkins, filed the legal challenge on Friday in the high court on behalf of Sewell and the party, against the commonwealth over the law, arguing it “operates as a doorway to tyranny”. The group is arguing the law used to ban it is invalid on the grounds that the legislation “burdens the freedom of governmental and political communication”. It states that Sewell is the party’s national president and is the “representative of the 1,778 members of the Australia" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="127332" data-entity-type="organization">White Australia Party”. In its application the Neo-Nazi group wrote that the name “Australia" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="127332" data-entity-type="organization">White Australia” reflects the “principle political objective of the party described as preservation of Anglo-Celtic heritage for the Australian people”. The court documents also state that the party registered as an incorporated association on 20 December last year under the Associations Incorporation Reform Act 2012 in Victoria. It said the party had applied to the AEC in order to become an “eligible political party” and to “satisfy formal requirements to compete for an win seats at the net federal general election and any intervening by-election” in the federal parliament. Individual members of Australia" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="127332" data-entity-type="organization">White Australia will still be able to run at the next election, despite the AEC’s rejection, but will run as independents, with no party name or logo attached on ballots. On the Senate ballot, it would also mean the individuals would be placed below the line – unless in a group of other independents. Explore more on these topics Australian politics Australian law news Share Reuse this content