Tim Day blamed
BHP’s
decarbonisation delay on obstacles to replacing the use of
diesel due to what he said were slow advancements in
electric trucking and rail technology. Composite: Krystle Wright/Guardian Design/
The Guardian View image in fullscreen
Tim Day blamed
BHP’s
decarbonisation delay on obstacles to replacing the use of
diesel due to what he said were slow advancements in
electric trucking and rail technology. Composite: Krystle Wright/Guardian Design/
The Guardian BHP admits to stalled
emissions reductions as WA premier says miners have ‘moral obligation’ to decarbonise Head of
BHP’s WA iron ore operations unable to give firm timeline for replacing
diesel trucks as leaked documents reveal
decarbonisation delay Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast A senior
BHP executive has admitted the Australian multinational’s push to reduce emissions has been delayed as the Western Australian premier,
Roger Cook, said big miners had an “important moral obligation” to decarbonise. An exclusive investigation based on documents leaked to
The Guardian and
ABC revealed this week that the world’s biggest miner has hit the brakes on
decarbonisation, something experts fear could put
Australia’s national
emissions reductions targets at risk. The leaked documents show it has scrapped an iron ore processing plant that would have prevented 1.7m tonnes of emissions each year, the equivalent of removing 350,000 cars, while pushing back vast renewables projects, buying new polluting
diesel fleets and war-gaming options to push critical climate investments into the next two decades. It did so despite internal memos acknowledging that slow
decarbonisation would have “reputational impacts” and that: “Urgent
decarbonisation in line with
BHP’s public commitments effectively underpins [WA iron ore’s] licence to operate, sustain and grow.” On Wednesday,
Tim Day, the head of
BHP’s WA iron ore operations, acknowledged that its
decarbonisation program had been delayed. He blamed significant obstacles to replacing the use of
diesel – the biggest source of its emissions – due to what he said were slow advancements in
electric trucking and rail technology. He was unable to give any firm timeline for replacing
diesel trucks. “The timeframe will take what it takes to get the
diesel replacement, but we see it, we’re testing now, we’ll keep going through it,” Day said, speaking at the
Australian Financial Review’s mining summit. “But it is delayed … we actually, we thought we’d be off
diesel a little quicker, but that is delayed.” Internal documents show
BHP has considered options to start the transition as late as 2035 or 2040, despite acknowledging the delays could cause reputational damage and put its net zero by 2050 goal at risk. Also speaking at the AFR’s conference, Cook, the WA premier, said
decarbonisation by big miners was an “important moral obligation”. “It’s an important part of mining companies maintaining their social licence to operate, so we would expect all mining companies, particularly big players, to play their part,” he said. The leaked documents have prompted concern about the effectiveness of the government’s key climate policy, the safeguard mechanism, which forced
BHP to pay less than $9m for excess emissions last year, according to analysis provided to
The Guardian. At the same time, it was given $622m in
diesel tax concessions by the federal government, something critics say is creating an unnecessary incentive for it to keep using highly polluting
diesel haulage. Cook would not be drawn on whether he thought the federal government should do anything to change the rebate. “Strictly speaking, the
diesel fuel rebate is to subsidise, is to return an excise to the companies that don’t use the roads that the excise is actually designed to help support and fund,” he said. “But I’ll leave that up to others to debate. But I acknowledge and I accept that we want to, as governments, create the best environment to incentivise mining companies to continue to decarbonise their operations.” The company has reduced its global emissions by 36% – largely due to the use of renewables in Chile and the closure of an uncompetitive nickel mine – but internal documents show its current plan to hit net zero has a “low probability of success”. Analysts say it has done little to reduce emissions from its Australian operations. Get in touch Contact Christopher Knaus about this story If you have something to share about this story, you can contact Chris using one of the following methods:
The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don’t already have
The Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select ‘Secure Messaging’. Once you've set yourself up, to send a message to Chris select ‘Investigations (Guardian
Australia’. If you don’t need a high level of security or confidentiality you can email christopher.knaus@theguardian.com. You can contact Christopher Knaus using the Signal Messenger app on +61 422 283 681. If you can safely use the tor network without being observed or monitored you can send messages and documents to
The Guardian via our SecureDrop platform. Finally, our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each. Show more Explore more on these topics
Australia news The
BHP files Mining (Business) Mining (Environment)
BHP Australia" class="entity-link entity-location" data-entity-id="706" data-entity-type="location">Western
Australia news Share Reuse this content