NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence
SRCThe Guardian - World News
LANGEN
LEANCenter-Left
WORDS688
ENT12
THU · 2026-06-18 · 04:00 GMTBRIEF NSR-2026-0618-85400
News/Rejoining customs union would not fix damage caused by Brexi…
NSR-2026-0618-85400News Report·EN·Economic Impact

Rejoining customs union would not fix damage caused by Brexit, research finds

Research by economists John Springford and Anton Spisak of the Centre for European Reform indicates that Brexit has reduced UK exports to the EU by 12%. The majority of this damage, 10%, is attributed to leaving the single market, not customs barriers.

Heather Stewart Economics editorThe Guardian - World NewsFiled 2026-06-18 · 04:00 GMTLean · Center-LeftRead · 3 min
Rejoining customs union would not fix damage caused by Brexit, research finds
The Guardian - World NewsFIG 01
Reading time
3min
Word count
688words
Sources cited
3cited
Entities identified
12entities
Quality score
100%
§ 01

Briefing Summary

AI-generated
NEWSAR · AI

Research by economists John Springford and Anton Spisak of the Centre for European Reform indicates that Brexit has reduced UK exports to the EU by 12%. The majority of this damage, 10%, is attributed to leaving the single market, not customs barriers. Rejoining the customs union would only partially mitigate these losses, offering no benefit to the services sector and potentially limiting the UK's ability to strike independent trade deals. The economists suggest that recovering the lost trade would necessitate re-integration with the EU's single market, which involves significant political trade-offs such as accepting free movement and budget contributions. This research comes as the UK's future relationship with the EU is a prominent topic in political discussions.

Confidence 0.90Sources 3Claims 5Entities 12
§ 02

Article analysis

Model · rule-based
Framing
Economic Impact
Political Strategy
Tone
Measured
AI-assessed
CalmNeutralAlarmist
Factuality
0.80 / 1.00
Factual
LowHigh
Sources cited
3
Well sourced
FewMany
§ 03

Key claims

5 extracted
01

Goods exports are 16% lower than they would have been if the UK had remained in the EU.

statisticCentre for European Reform
Confidence
0.90
02

Services sector exports to the EU are 7% lower than they would have been if the UK had remained in the EU.

statisticCentre for European Reform
Confidence
0.90
03

Brexit has depressed UK exports to the EU by 12%.

statisticCentre for European Reform
Confidence
0.90
04

The overwhelming majority of the impact – 10% of the total 12% decline in exports – is accounted for by leaving the single market.

statisticCentre for European Reform
Confidence
0.85
05

Rejoining the customs union would undo only a fraction of the damage caused by Brexit.

factualCentre for European Reform
Confidence
0.85
§ 04

Full report

3 min read · 688 words
Brexit has depressed UK exports to the EU by 12%, and rejoining the customs union would undo only a fraction of the damage, research shared with the Guardian shows.With the UK’s future relationship with the bloc likely to feature prominently in a potential Labour leadership contest, the economists John Springford and Anton Spisak, of the Centre for European Reform, provide fresh evidence of the damage caused by exiting.A decade on from the referendum, they have found that services sector exports to the EU are 7% lower than they would have been if the UK had remained in the EU, and goods exports are 16% lower.Using detailed trade data and economic modelling, they show that the “overwhelming majority” of the impact – 10% of the total 12% decline in exports – is accounted for by leaving the single market.“The regulatory costs related to Brexit – such as new certification procedures and checks for compliance with EU standards – have had a much more significant impact on UK-EU trade than customs-related barriers,” they say.The hardest-hit sectors have been travel, finance and insurance, chemicals and pharmaceuticals, and agrifood.The estimate of lost services exports is larger than previous research has suggested, because the authors take into account a significant uptick in services trade within the EU since the Covid pandemic that the UK has missed out on.Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have increasingly stressed the importance of striking a closer trading relationship with the EU, with a summit to be held next month.But the government has said it will stick to Labour’s manifesto promises not to rejoin the single market or customs union, or accept the free movement of people.More recently, potential leadership candidates Andy Burnham and Wes Streeting have both suggested they would like to see the UK rejoin the EU at some point in the future.The Liberal Democrats had previously advocated rejoining the customs union as the first step to reversing Brexit, but their leader, Ed Davey, announced this week that the party would now campaign for the UK to re-enter the single market.The CER research suggests the upside of rejoining the customs union alone would be modest. It would eliminate the need for UK firms to comply with complex “rules of origin”, about where the content of exports comes from, to qualify for tariff-free trade.But a customs union would have no benefit for the hard-hit services sector, and by analysing which goods exports currently do not comply with the rules, Springford and Spisak suggest the impact on overall trade would be small.Meanwhile the UK would lose the opportunity to pursue trade deals with non-EU countries, because members of the customs union have to apply EU tariffs.However, Springford and Spisak point out that the more radical step of rejoining the single market would entail risky political trade-offs, including signing up to the free movement of people, paying into the EU budget and following European rules the UK has had no say in setting.“The overwhelming majority of the estimated trade impacts stem from leaving the single market. Recovering those losses would entail re-integrating with the EU economy via a single market, either in goods or in full, through a bespoke arrangement or eventual EU membership,” they argue.“Either path involves difficult political choices: accepting free movement, making budget contributions, and aligning with EU rules without a vote on them. The more privileged the single market access sought by the UK, the greater the obligations it would be expected to accept.”Reeves has suggested “dynamic alignment” in some sectors, with the UK agreeing to follow EU rules in exchange for increased market access. But Brussels-watchers are sceptical how much further along this route the EU would be willing to go without insisting the UK accept free movement and budget contributions.Advocates of Brexit argued before the 2016 referendum that increased trade with non-EU countries, as the UK disentangled itself from the constraints imposed by Brussels, would offset any hit to EU trade. But Springford and Spisak find little evidence that this has happened thus far.They say their findings are consistent with several studies suggesting that Brexit has knocked between 4% and 8% off UK GDP.
§ 05

Entities

12 identified
§ 06

Keywords & salience

10 terms
brexit
1.00
uk exports
0.90
customs union
0.80
single market
0.80
eu trade
0.70
economic damage
0.60
services sector
0.50
regulatory costs
0.50
labour party
0.40
centre for european reform
0.40
§ 07

Topic connections

Interactive graph
Network visualization showing 25 related topics
View Full Graph
Person Organization Location Event|Click node to navigate|Edge numbers = shared articles