Supreme Court strikes down US campaign spending limits in landmark ruling
The Supreme Court has struck down limits on coordinated campaign spending between political parties and candidates in a 6-3 decision, citing First Amendment free speech protections. This ruling, delivered on the final day of the Court's term, overturns a provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 that restricted such joint spending.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedThe Supreme Court has struck down limits on coordinated campaign spending between political parties and candidates in a 6-3 decision, citing First Amendment free speech protections. This ruling, delivered on the final day of the Court's term, overturns a provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 that restricted such joint spending. The decision stems from a Republican-led lawsuit, with Vice President JD Vance as one of the candidates involved. The Court found that these spending caps violate the Constitution's guarantee of free speech. This decision reverses a previous 2001 Supreme Court ruling that had upheld these limits.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedThe Supreme Court overruled a 2001 decision that had upheld similar spending limits.
The lawsuit was brought by Republicans, centering on Vice President JD Vance's 2022 Senate run.
The decision strikes down a provision of the Federal Campaign Act of 1971 limiting coordinated party spending.
The ruling was a 6-3 decision, with conservative judges in the majority and liberal judges dissenting.
The Supreme Court struck down campaign spending limits, citing First Amendment protections.