Keir Starmer forced on back foot at PMQs over ‘weak’ defence plan
Keir Starmer faced criticism in Parliament over his recently announced £298bn defence investment plan. Critics argue the plan, which raises defence spending to 2.7% of GDP by 2030, leaves his successor, expected to be Andy Burnham, with a £4.7bn funding gap.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedKeir Starmer faced criticism in Parliament over his recently announced £298bn defence investment plan. Critics argue the plan, which raises defence spending to 2.7% of GDP by 2030, leaves his successor, expected to be Andy Burnham, with a £4.7bn funding gap. This backlash stems from concerns about cuts to transport infrastructure to fund the plan and its failure to meet NATO targets. Kemi Badenoch accused Starmer of presenting an insufficient and unfunded plan, suggesting it is £5bn short. Starmer defended the plan, highlighting increased defence spending outside the budget and accusing the Conservatives of cutting defence while increasing welfare spending. He stated the plan was made possible by existing budgetary headroom.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedStarmer accused the Conservatives of cutting defence and increasing welfare spending by £88bn while in power.
Kemi Badenoch accused Starmer of producing an insufficient plan, stating it is £5bn short.
The defence investment plan does not lay out a plan to reach the Nato target of 3.5% defence spending by 2035.
Overall, defence spending will rise from 2.6% of GDP in 2027 to 2.7% by 2030.
Keir Starmer's defence investment plan leaves his successor with an extra £4.7bn to find in their first budget.