Claim that fire alarms would not have saved lives in Tai Po blaze draws rebuke
During a public inquiry into a devastating fire at Wang Fuk Court in Hong Kong, the legal counsel for a director of fire service contractor China Status Development and Engineering suggested that residents would have died even if the fire alarms had been functional. The lawyer argued that occupants of the first building to catch fire on November 26 would have had less than 10 minutes to escape, regardless of an alarm.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedDuring a public inquiry into a devastating fire at Wang Fuk Court in Hong Kong, the legal counsel for a director of fire service contractor China Status Development and Engineering suggested that residents would have died even if the fire alarms had been functional. The lawyer argued that occupants of the first building to catch fire on November 26 would have had less than 10 minutes to escape, regardless of an alarm. This statement drew a rebuke from the judge overseeing the inquiry, who questioned if the contractor was attempting to evade responsibility for the disaster, which resulted in 168 deaths and displaced nearly 5,000 people. The inquiry is examining the causes and circumstances of the tragedy.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
4 extractedThe tragedy killed 168 people and left nearly 5,000 homeless.
The judge overseeing the inquiry questioned if the contractor was attempting to evade responsibility.
Residents in the first building to catch fire would have had less than 10 minutes to escape even with prompt alerts.
Residents of Hong Kong’s blaze-ravaged Wang Fuk Court would still have died even if fire alarms had been working.