How a push to protect parental rights is reshaping Texas’ foster care system
Recent court rulings in Texas are signaling increased scrutiny of the state's child welfare system, particularly regarding parental rights. Following a voter-approved constitutional amendment on parental rights, Texas courts have pushed back on the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) in cases involving permanent removal of children.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedRecent court rulings in Texas are signaling increased scrutiny of the state's child welfare system, particularly regarding parental rights. Following a voter-approved constitutional amendment on parental rights, Texas courts have pushed back on the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) in cases involving permanent removal of children. The Texas Supreme Court has intervened in two cases, questioning the agency's assessment for complete parental rights termination. In a third ruling, a judge found DFPS violated parents' due process rights by denying an appeal in a case concerning their newborn's jaundice. These developments stem from years of policy changes, court-ordered reforms, and a post-pandemic increase in parental pushback against state actions. The article notes a trend towards narrowing the definition of neglect and strengthening parental due process rights, leading to a significant decrease in child removals.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedSophia Howard, a Texas ACLU law fellow, stated, 'Our goal is to hold people’s toes to the fire to what the Constitution requires. The Constitution requires due process.'
An Austin judge ruled that DFPS violated the constitutional rights of the Jackson couple by not allowing an appeal after their child was briefly removed over a jaundice dispute.
The Texas Supreme Court pushed back on the agency’s assessment that parents should lose their rights entirely in two cases, allowing children to be put up for adoption.
Three recent court rulings signal increased scrutiny for the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services when permanently removing children from abusive families.
Texas courts are signaling that general concerns about child abuse will require more evidence for the state to permanently remove a child from their home.