NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence
SRCThe Guardian - World News
LANGEN
LEANCenter-Left
WORDS719
ENT12
MON · 2026-07-27 · 04:14 GMTBRIEF NSR-2026-0727-96273
News/Australian court rejects racial discrimi/Pauline Hanson loses bid to overturn Mehreen Faruqi racial d…
NSR-2026-0727-96273News Report·EN·Legal & Judicial

Pauline Hanson loses bid to overturn Mehreen Faruqi racial discrimination finding

A federal court has upheld a previous finding that Pauline Hanson engaged in racial discrimination against Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi. The ruling came after Hanson appealed a judgment that her September 2022 tweet, telling Faruqi to "pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan," breached the Racial Discrimination Act.

Jordyn BeazleyThe Guardian - World NewsFiled 2026-07-27 · 04:14 GMTLean · Center-LeftRead · 3 min
Pauline Hanson loses bid to overturn Mehreen Faruqi racial discrimination finding
The Guardian - World NewsFIG 01
Reading time
3min
Word count
719words
Sources cited
0cited
Entities identified
12entities
Quality score
100%
§ 01

Briefing Summary

AI-generated
NEWSAR · AI

A federal court has upheld a previous finding that Pauline Hanson engaged in racial discrimination against Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi. The ruling came after Hanson appealed a judgment that her September 2022 tweet, telling Faruqi to "pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan," breached the Racial Discrimination Act. Hanson's appeal failed on all seven grounds. The court found Hanson's tweet was "seriously offensive" and intimidating, portraying Faruqi as a "second-class citizen" and using a "racist trope." Faruqi stated the ruling was a victory for anyone told to "go back to where you came from" and that hate speech is not free speech. Hanson indicated her legal team is reviewing the decision for a potential High Court appeal.

Confidence 0.90Claims 5Entities 12
§ 02

Article analysis

Model · rule-based
Framing
Legal & Judicial
Social Justice
Tone
Measured
AI-assessed
CalmNeutralAlarmist
Factuality
0.90 / 1.00
Factual
LowHigh
Sources cited
0
No named sources
FewMany
§ 03

Key claims

5 extracted
01

The court found Hanson's comment was a 'racist trope' and a 'strong form of racism'.

factualFederal Court Justices
Confidence
1.00
02

Justice Angus Stewart found Hanson's tweet was 'seriously offensive' and breached the Racial Discrimination Act.

factualJustice Angus Stewart
Confidence
1.00
03

Hanson tweeted that Mehreen Faruqi should 'pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan'.

quotePauline Hanson
Confidence
1.00
04

The federal court upheld the finding that Pauline Hanson engaged in racial discrimination against Mehreen Faruqi.

factual
Confidence
1.00
05

Pauline Hanson lost her bid to overturn a federal court finding that she racially discriminated against Mehreen Faruqi.

factual
Confidence
1.00
§ 04

Full report

3 min read · 719 words
Pauline Hanson (left) appealed a federal court decision that found she had racially discriminated against Mehreen Faruqi (right) in a 2022 social media post. Composite: AAP/Getty Images View image in fullscreen Pauline Hanson (left) appealed a federal court decision that found she had racially discriminated against Mehreen Faruqi (right) in a 2022 social media post. Composite: AAP/Getty Images Pauline Hanson loses bid to overturn Mehreen Faruqi racial discrimination finding Judges find in Faruqi’s favour after One Nation leader launched an appeal against judgement she had breached Racial Discrimination Act Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast A court has upheld the finding that Pauline Hanson engaged in racial discrimination against Mehreen Faruqi when she tweeted the Greens senator should “pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan”. The One Nation leader launched the appeal in November, almost a month after Justice Angus Stewart found Hanson engaged in “seriously offensive” and intimidating behaviour against Faruqi in the September 2022 social media post that breached the Racial Discrimination Act. On Monday, Stewart’s decision was unanimously upheld by federal court justices Melissa Perry, Geoffrey Kennett, and Elizabeth Bennett after Hanson’s bid failed on all seven grounds. Faruqi was in court for the judgment, but Hanson did not make an appearance. The proceedings centred around an interaction the pair had on X shortly after Queen Elizabeth II died, with the judgment setting out details of the interaction. Faruqi had tweeted about the Queen’s death: “Condolences to those who knew the Queen. I cannot mourn the leader of a racist empire built on stolen lives, land and wealth of colonised peoples. We are reminded of the urgency of Treaty with First Nations, justice & reparations for British colonies & becoming a republic.” Hanson tweeted in response: “Your attitude appalls and disgusts me. When you immigrated to Australia you took every advantage of this country. You took citizenship, bought multiple homes, and a job in a parliament. It’s clear you’re not happy, so pack your bags and piss off back to Pakistan - PH.” Stewart found the One Nation leader’s tweet was unlawful and portrayed Faruqi as a “second-class citizen” who took advantage of Australia and who, as a migrant to the country, “should be grateful for what she has and keep quiet” – a position he declared to be “exclusionary”. Stewart found Hanson’s comment that Faruqi should “piss off back to Pakistan” was a “variant of the slogan ‘go back to from where you came from’” which he said was an a “racist trope” and a “strong form of racism”. He added that Hanson’s tweet, given her profile, likely “empowered others” to make similar or worse comments. Stewart had said the case had functioned as “a test case” for both Faruqi and Hanson’s claims. Faruqi proved a “common form of egregious behaviour is unlawful”. Meanwhile Hanson attempted to prove in her failed bid that section 18C of the act breached the implied freedom of political communication. Hanson said in a statement posted to X after the judgement that her legal team is closely reviewing the decision “with a view to commencing an appeal in the High Court of Australia”. Faruqi said outside court in response to this: “If she wants to be racist and defend herself for being a racist in the in the high court, then bring it on.” Faruqi said of her win would have wide-ranging impact, with today’s win being “for every single person out there who has been told to go back to where you came from”. “Today is a win for every single person who has been made to feel that their belonging in this country is conditional.” “Hate speech is not free speech, and and the federal court has reaffirmed that today. “This ruling today in this court court case shows that we can fight back and we can win.” Faruqi said that the “seeds of One Nation’s racism” has been allowed to grow because both Labor and Liberal governments “have never stood up to it”. In December, Hanson lost a bid to reduce the costs she was liable to pay Faruqi over the initial court case. Explore more on these topics Australian Greens One Nation Pauline Hanson Race news Share Reuse this content
§ 05

Entities

12 identified
§ 06

Keywords & salience

9 terms
pauline hanson
1.00
mehreen faruqi
1.00
racial discrimination
1.00
racial discrimination act
0.90
appeal
0.80
social media post
0.70
one nation
0.60
federal court
0.50
migrant
0.40
§ 07

Topic connections

Interactive graph
Network visualization showing 51 related topics
View Full Graph
Person Organization Location Event|Click node to navigate|Edge numbers = shared articles