Top US science journals more likely to reject paper by Chinese authors: study
A study analyzing over 110,000 manuscripts submitted to Science and Science Advances between 2015 and 2020 found that papers from China-based researchers had a significantly lower acceptance rate (2.5%) compared to those from North America (8.3%). The research, published in Science Advances, also revealed that US-based scientists with Chinese surnames experienced lower publication rates than their counterparts without Chinese surnames.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedA study analyzing over 110,000 manuscripts submitted to Science and Science Advances between 2015 and 2020 found that papers from China-based researchers had a significantly lower acceptance rate (2.5%) compared to those from North America (8.3%). The research, published in Science Advances, also revealed that US-based scientists with Chinese surnames experienced lower publication rates than their counterparts without Chinese surnames. Lead author Sam Zhang suggested that China's research system, which provides career and financial incentives for submitting to elite journals, might lead to submissions that are not always the best fit for the journals' scope.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
4 extractedUS-based scientists with Chinese surnames had lower publication rates than those without.
2.5% of submissions from China-based researchers were accepted, vs. 8.3% overall for North America.
Researchers based in China or with Chinese surnames were less likely to have papers published in top journals than US/Canadian counterparts.
China's research system may incentivize submissions to elite journals, potentially leading to less suitable studies being submitted.