Mainland Chinese families lose legal challenge over public university fees
A group of 87 mainland Chinese families who relocated to Hong Kong under talent visa schemes has lost a High Court challenge against a government policy change. The policy, announced in July 2025 by the Education Bureau, requires children of parents on these schemes to have resided in Hong Kong for at least two years to qualify for subsidized university fees from 2028.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedA group of 87 mainland Chinese families who relocated to Hong Kong under talent visa schemes has lost a High Court challenge against a government policy change. The policy, announced in July 2025 by the Education Bureau, requires children of parents on these schemes to have resided in Hong Kong for at least two years to qualify for subsidized university fees from 2028. High Court Judge Russell Coleman ruled that the residency requirement was not irrational. The families had filed a judicial review against the new policy, including the "one-year rule" introduced as a preparatory measure for the 2027-28 applications.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extracted87 families filed a judicial review against the new policy, including the 'one-year rule'.
The government announced the policy change in July 2025, with a gradual tightening of eligibility.
The policy requires children of parents on talent visas to have lived in Hong Kong for at least two years for subsidized university fees from 2028.
High Court Judge Russell Coleman ruled there was no irrationality in the Education Bureau's residency requirement for subsidized university fees.
Mainland Chinese families lost a legal challenge over public university fees in Hong Kong.