NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence
SRCThe Guardian - World News
LANGEN
LEANCenter-Left
WORDS746
ENT12
THU · 2026-08-06 · 18:06 GMTBRIEF NSR-2026-0806-99871
News/Foster + Partners cleared over man’s death when window fell …
NSR-2026-0806-99871News Report·EN·Legal & Judicial

Foster + Partners cleared over man’s death when window fell from London penthouse

Foster + Partners has been cleared of responsibility in the 2018 death of Mick Ferris, a coach driver killed when a 130kg window fell 90 meters from a London penthouse. A jury at Inner London crown court found project managers St James and engineers Lindner Prater guilty of safety breaches.

Matthew WeaverThe Guardian - World NewsFiled 2026-08-06 · 18:06 GMTLean · Center-LeftRead · 3 min
Foster + Partners cleared over man’s death when window fell from London penthouse
The Guardian - World NewsFIG 01
Reading time
3min
Word count
746words
Sources cited
3cited
Entities identified
12entities
Quality score
100%
§ 01

Briefing Summary

AI-generated
NEWSAR · AI

Foster + Partners has been cleared of responsibility in the 2018 death of Mick Ferris, a coach driver killed when a 130kg window fell 90 meters from a London penthouse. A jury at Inner London crown court found project managers St James and engineers Lindner Prater guilty of safety breaches. The court heard that the outward-opening window, which had a restrictor that was removed, was blown off its hinges by strong winds. A previous window panel had fallen from the same development a year earlier without injury, but no design changes were made. The prosecution argued that the designers ignored concerns about the risks of such windows and failed to consider the consequences of the restrictor failing. Foster + Partners' role was limited to visual design aspects, and they were not involved in technical issues.

Confidence 0.90Sources 3Claims 5Entities 12
§ 02

Article analysis

Model · rule-based
Framing
Legal & Judicial
Public Health
Tone
Measured
AI-assessed
CalmNeutralAlarmist
Factuality
0.90 / 1.00
Factual
LowHigh
Sources cited
3
Well sourced
FewMany
§ 03

Key claims

5 extracted
01

The prosecution stated Ferris's death was foreseeable and designers ignored concerns about outward-opening windows.

quoteGordon Menzies
Confidence
1.00
02

A window panel had fallen from the same development a year earlier, but no changes were made to designs.

factualarticle
Confidence
1.00
03

A 130kg window fell from the Corniche luxury tower block, killing Mick Ferris instantly.

factualarticle
Confidence
1.00
04

St James and Lindner Prater were found guilty of safety breaches over the death of Mick Ferris.

factualarticle
Confidence
1.00
05

Foster + Partners was cleared over the death of a man killed by a falling window from a London penthouse.

factualarticle
Confidence
1.00
§ 04

Full report

3 min read · 746 words
The architecture firm founded by Norman Foster has been cleared over the death of a man killed by a window that fell 90 metres from a newly constructed London penthouse.Foster + Partners (F+P), the practice behind some of the world’s most recognisable buildings such as the Gherkin and revamps of the British Museum and Germany’s Reichstag, were not held to be responsible for the death of Mick Ferris, a 53-year-old coach driver, in 2018.However, St James, the project managers of the building where the incident took place, and the project’s engineers, Lindner Prater, were found guilty of safety breaches over the death by a jury at London-crown-court" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="145427" data-entity-type="organization">Inner London crown court.Ferris was killed instantly when the 130kg (287lbs) window fell from the penthouse of the Corniche, a luxury tower block development on Albert Embankment, on to the street below.The jury was told the designers should have considered the risk of the outward-opening, side-hung windows. Photograph: Nick Ansell/PAThe court heard that just over a year earlier a window panel had also fallen from the same development. “Miraculously” no one was hurt but no changes were made to the designs as a result of that incident, the court heard.The prosecution, which was brought by the Health and Safety Executive, said Ferris’s death was foreseeable and the designers had ignored concerns about the proven danger of outward-opening windows.After more than 11 hours of deliberation the jury cleared F+P and the building’s design engineer, Wintech. But it found St James and Lindner Prater had failed in their duty to keep the public safe under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.The prosecutor Gordon Menzies told the jury it “wasn’t an accident waiting to happen … it was an accident that had already happened in August 2017. The prosecution say it was an accident waiting to happen again.”Ferris was killed by the falling window which had been blown off its hinges when the building was almost complete, the court heard. A woman coming towards him, who was pushing a wheelchair, narrowly missed being hit, jurors were told. A restrictor put in place to prevent the window being blown off had been removed, they heard.The designers had failed to consider the “catastrophic” consequences if something went wrong with this restrictor, the prosecution said. They also failed to take into account the fulcrum effect of an 85cm (33in) window being prised off its hinges, the prosecution said.Jurors were told that after the first window panel fell from the building the designers failed to use the incident as a reason to “go back to the drawing board”. The jury was told of 12 “missed opportunities” where the designers should have considered the risk of the outward-opening, side-hung windows.Billboards outside the new development in March 2017. Photograph: Martin Godwin/The GuardianAll four defendants denied the charges and claimed they did all that was reasonably practicable to ensure safety.Menzies told the court: “The wind was sufficiently strong to blow the window open further than 8 and a half inches and the oversailing glass clashed with the frame and, as a result, the hinges were prised off.”skip past newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotionOriginally the windows had been designed to open inwards, but the design was changed to avoid them clashing with an internal ceiling coffer containing wires and pipes that they would have cleared, the court was told.It was only after Ferris’s death that the window design was changed back to inward-opening, the court heard. The prosecution said F+P should have known such risks due to its specialist knowledge of glass-covered buildings including the Gherkin.Lawyers for F+P said the firm’s role was limited and it was not involved in technical issues. They said it was there to focus on the visual aspects of the design.A spokesperson for F+P said: “Our thoughts remain with Mr Ferris’s family, as they have since October 2018. We note the court’s decision and are grateful to the jury for the time and care they have taken in considering this matter.”A spokesperson for Wintech said: “While the court has reached its conclusion, the tragedy of what happened remains. It is vital that we continue to reflect and learn, and as an industry, remain committed to strengthening standards and practices to help prevent such incidents in the future.”A spokesperson for St James said: “The death of Mick Ferris in 2018 was tragic. Our thoughts remain with his family and friends. We acknowledge today’s verdict and will carefully consider its implications.”Lindner Prater has been approached for comment.
§ 05

Entities

12 identified
§ 06

Keywords & salience

10 terms
falling window
1.00
safety breaches
1.00
foster + partners
0.90
workplace safety
0.80
building design
0.70
engineers
0.60
project managers
0.60
health and safety executive
0.50
luxury tower block
0.50
foreseeable death
0.40
§ 07

Topic connections

Interactive graph
No topic relationship data available yet. This graph will appear once topic relationships have been computed.