US Supreme Court appears sceptical of US birthright citizenship challenge

The US Supreme Court appears skeptical of President Trump's executive order challenging birthright citizenship, signaled during oral arguments on Wednesday. The case centers on the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause, specifically whether children of undocumented immigrants born in the US are "subject to the jurisdiction thereof." Trump's administration argues that limiting birthright citizenship is necessary to curb illegal immigration, while opponents contend it would overturn established precedent. Solicitor General John Sauer argued the 14th Amendment was misinterpreted and should only apply to children of foreign diplomats and a few other limited groups. Several justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts, questioned the administration's authority to exclude children of undocumented immigrants from citizenship. A ruling against Trump would mark a second consecutive setback at the high court regarding his policies.

The Supreme Court heard arguments regarding the legality of a potential executive order by Donald Trump that would redefine birthright citizenship in the United States. The case challenges the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to almost anyone born on US soil. Trump's presence at the hearing underscored the significance of the case, which could strip citizenship from an estimated 250,000 babies born in the US annually. While some justices expressed skepticism towards the administration's arguments, others raised concerns about the implications of challenging the order. A final decision is expected in June, and the ruling could have far-reaching consequences for who is considered an American citizen.