El regreso de Justin Bieber a los escenarios desata el debate: 10 millones en Coachella por un karaoke con vídeos de YouTube

Justin Bieber's headlining performance at Coachella 2026 has sparked controversy. After a period of erratic behavior, his return to the stage was met with criticism for being lackluster and uninspired. The 32-year-old singer reportedly earned $10 million for the performance, which included playing old YouTube videos of his songs instead of performing them live. During a medley of 12 songs, Bieber sat with a laptop and navigated YouTube to play his older music. While some fans defended the YouTube segment as a nod to his origins, many online commenters and celebrities like Katy Perry mocked the performance as low-effort.

Justin Bieber regresó a los escenarios principales en el festival de Coachella en California este fin de semana. Presentó canciones de sus nuevos álbumes, *Swag* y *Swag II*, lanzados en 2025, y realizó un repaso nostálgico de sus inicios en internet. El concierto se convirtió en un karaoke multitudinario, donde Bieber interpretaba canciones solicitadas a través de YouTube, incluyendo éxitos como "Baby" y "Favourite Girl", e incluso proyectó un video de su cover de "With You" de Chris Brown. El artista, que no actuaba en escenarios grandes desde 2022, alternó entre canciones nuevas y clásicas, cerrando su presentación con invitados especiales como Dijon, Tems, Wizkid y Mk.gee.

Justin Bieber's highly anticipated return to the stage at Coachella 2026 sparked controversy due to the simplicity of his performance. Bieber, back after his 2022 tour, performed by playing his music videos from a laptop and singing along, which many likened to karaoke. The performance, intended as a nostalgic journey through his early career, drew heavy criticism online. Many users on platforms like X and TikTok deemed the show "lazy" and "effortless," questioning the high cost associated with the performance. While some fans defended the symbolic use of YouTube, the platform that launched his career, the overall reception was largely negative, with many criticizing the lack of energy and engagement.