NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence

US judge nixes two subpoenas against Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell

3 articles
3 sources
0% diversity
Updated 13.3.2026
Key Topics & People
James Boasberg *Jerome Powell Federal Reserve Jeanine Pirro United States Justice Department

Coverage Framing

3
Legal & Judicial(3)
Avg Factuality:73%
Avg Sensationalism:Low

Story Timeline

Mar 13 Evening

3 articles|3 sources
jerome powellsubpoenasinterest ratesjudge james boasbergpolitical pressure
Legal & Judicial(3)
Al JazeeraMar 13

US judge nixes two subpoenas against Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell

A US judge, James Boasberg, quashed two subpoenas against Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Friday, March 13, 2026, determining they were issued for an "improper purpose" to harass Powell. The judge's decision cited a months-long campaign under former President Donald Trump to pressure the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates. Boasberg stated the government produced "essentially zero evidence" of any crime by Powell, suggesting the subpoenas were pretextual. The US attorney overseeing the case, Jeanine Pirro, a Trump appointee, criticized the ruling, accusing Boasberg of interfering in a grand jury proceeding and plans to appeal the decision. The subpoenas, though unsealed, remain partially redacted.

MeasuredFactual3 sources
Positive
BBC News - WorldMar 13

Judge says 'no evidence' to justify Federal Reserve probe

A US judge blocked a Department of Justice investigation into the Federal Reserve, siding with Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, who claimed the probe was politically motivated to pressure the bank to lower interest rates. Judge James Boasberg stated that prosecutor Jeanine Pirro presented "no evidence" to justify her demands for information. Pirro, a Trump ally and US attorney for the District of Columbia, issued subpoenas in January regarding cost overruns at Fed office renovations after her inquiries were ignored. Powell accused the Trump administration of launching the probe to influence interest rates. Boasberg concluded the subpoenas were issued to harass Powell into complying with President Trump's demands or to force his resignation, while the government provided no evidence of wrongdoing by Powell. Pirro intends to appeal the decision, criticizing it as undermining her ability to investigate crime.

MeasuredFactual6 sources
Neutral
South China Morning PostMar 13

Judge quashes subpoenas of Fed chair, says investigation was ‘politically motivated’

A federal judge quashed Justice Department subpoenas issued to the Federal Reserve in January, ruling the investigation was politically motivated. Judge James Boasberg stated the subpoenas aimed to pressure Fed Chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates, aligning with President Trump's demands. The investigation, revealed by Powell in January, led Senator Thom Tillis to block Trump's nominee for Fed chair. Boasberg cited "abundant evidence" that the subpoenas' purpose was to harass Powell into complying with the president or resigning. US Attorney Jeanine Pirro, who issued the subpoenas, announced she would appeal the ruling.

MeasuredFactual4 sources
Negative

Key Claims

factual

Judge James Boasberg quashed two subpoenas related to an investigation into Jerome Powell.

quote

Boasberg concluded that the subpoenas had been issued for an “improper purpose”: to harass Powell into compliance.

— Judge James Boasberg

factual

Trump repeatedly called for Powell to step down as part of a campaign to force the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates.

quote

The government has produced essentially zero evidence to suspect Chair Powell of a crime.

— Judge James Boasberg

quote

Jeanine Pirro accused Boasberg of “inserting himself” into a grand jury proceeding and offering Powell immunity from prosecution.

— Jeanine Pirro