Why US sanctions threats against China aren’t credible
Independent economist Dr. Andy Xie argues that US threats of sanctions against China over its relationship with Iran are not credible.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedIndependent economist Dr. Andy Xie argues that US threats of sanctions against China over its relationship with Iran are not credible. He contends that the US is more vulnerable to economic shocks due to its artificial intelligence bubble and precarious bond market, while China's economy is resilient. Xie suggests that even if the US were to remove major Chinese institutions from the SWIFT system, it would likely accelerate the global adoption of the yuan and its CIPS payment system, as China's trading partners could easily switch. The US's focus on economic warfare against Iran, and by extension China, reflects a lack of other options. This situation marks a reversal from the trade and tech war initiated by the US, when China faced its own economic challenges.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedUS threat of sanctions on China due to Beijing's relationship with Iran isn't credible.
Kicking Chinese institutions off SWIFT would accelerate the yuan's rise.
The US is targeting China by aiming to impose secondary sanctions on Iran's trading partners.
The US is more vulnerable to a shock than China due to its AI bubble and precarious bond market.
China's trading partners can easily switch to the yuan payment system, CIPS.