Faster homework, poor exam results: What AI is doing to students’ learning
A study of approximately 27,000 Chinese students aged 12-18 over 30 months revealed that while generative AI significantly improved homework scores by 18% and reduced completion time by 30%, it led to a 20% decline in monthly exam scores within six months. This suggests that outsourcing tasks to AI enhances performance on assignments but does not translate to genuine learning.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedA study of approximately 27,000 Chinese students aged 12-18 over 30 months revealed that while generative AI significantly improved homework scores by 18% and reduced completion time by 30%, it led to a 20% decline in monthly exam scores within six months. This suggests that outsourcing tasks to AI enhances performance on assignments but does not translate to genuine learning. Similar findings were reported by the OECD, indicating that when generative AI is not integrated into structured learning, it leads to performance improvements without real learning gains. This phenomenon is emerging as AI adoption increases in classrooms globally, with countries like China and the UAE actively integrating AI into curricula.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
4 extractedChina requires at least eight hours of AI instruction a year.
When students sat monthly exams without AI, their scores fell by 20 percent within six months.
After adopting generative AI, students' homework scores rose by 18 percent, while the time spent on each assignment fell by about 30 percent.
Where generative AI is neither built to teach nor used under any structure, outsourcing tasks to the model improves performance with no real learning gains.