NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence
SRCAl Jazeera
LANGEN
LEANCenter
WORDS334
ENT12
WED · 2026-09-02 · 06:01 GMTBRIEF NSR-2026-0902-108382
News/Faster homework, poor exam results: What AI is doing to stud…
NSR-2026-0902-108382News Report·EN·Technology

Faster homework, poor exam results: What AI is doing to students’ learning

A study of approximately 27,000 Chinese students aged 12-18 over 30 months revealed that while generative AI significantly improved homework scores by 18% and reduced completion time by 30%, it led to a 20% decline in monthly exam scores within six months. This suggests that outsourcing tasks to AI enhances performance on assignments but does not translate to genuine learning.

Mohamed HusseinAl JazeeraFiled 2026-09-02 · 06:01 GMTLean · CenterRead · 2 min
Faster homework, poor exam results: What AI is doing to students’ learning
Al JazeeraFIG 01
Reading time
2min
Word count
334words
Sources cited
2cited
Entities identified
12entities
Quality score
100%
§ 01

Briefing Summary

AI-generated
NEWSAR · AI

A study of approximately 27,000 Chinese students aged 12-18 over 30 months revealed that while generative AI significantly improved homework scores by 18% and reduced completion time by 30%, it led to a 20% decline in monthly exam scores within six months. This suggests that outsourcing tasks to AI enhances performance on assignments but does not translate to genuine learning. Similar findings were reported by the OECD, indicating that when generative AI is not integrated into structured learning, it leads to performance improvements without real learning gains. This phenomenon is emerging as AI adoption increases in classrooms globally, with countries like China and the UAE actively integrating AI into curricula.

Confidence 0.90Sources 2Claims 4Entities 12
§ 02

Article analysis

Model · rule-based
Framing
Technology
Human Interest
Tone
Mixed Tone
AI-assessed
CalmNeutralAlarmist
Factuality
0.80 / 1.00
Factual
LowHigh
Sources cited
2
Limited
FewMany
§ 03

Key claims

4 extracted
01

China requires at least eight hours of AI instruction a year.

statisticArticle
Confidence
0.90
02

When students sat monthly exams without AI, their scores fell by 20 percent within six months.

statisticDavid Stromberg, Victor Lei, Yanhui Wu
Confidence
0.90
03

After adopting generative AI, students' homework scores rose by 18 percent, while the time spent on each assignment fell by about 30 percent.

statisticDavid Stromberg, Victor Lei, Yanhui Wu
Confidence
0.90
04

Where generative AI is neither built to teach nor used under any structure, outsourcing tasks to the model improves performance with no real learning gains.

factualOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Confidence
0.80
§ 04

Full report

2 min read · 334 words
EXPLAINERArtificial intelligence is spreading in classrooms, but its impact on learning depends less on the technology than on how students use it.Hundreds of millions of primary and secondary students are starting their schools for the new academic year this month. But the advent of Artificial Intelligence is changing the students’ learning process.Students and teachers are grappling with the question: what is homework for, when an AI chatbot can finish it in seconds?Some countries have moved fast with the adoption of AI. China requires at least eight hours of AI instruction a year, and in the Gulf, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Qatar have all begun integrating AI into their curricula.AI chatbots can make learning faster and easier. But what happens when students put the technology aside? How much of the learning was theirs, and how much stayed with the machine?Faster homework, weaker examsTo investigate this, David Stromberg of Stockholm University, with Victor Lei and Yanhui Wu of the University of Hong Kong, ran one of the largest studies of its kind, tracking about 27,000 students aged 12 to 18 in China for 30 months.Their working paper combined data on homework, monthly closed-book exams and high-stakes entrance exams across nine subjects.The results reveal a striking gap between doing schoolwork and learning from it.After adopting generative AI, students’ homework scores rose by 18 percent, while the time spent on each assignment fell by about 30 percent, from 64 minutes to 45 minutes on average.But when the same students sat monthly exams without AI, their scores fell by 20 percent within six months. Their performance in high-stakes entrance exams also declined, with the full effect emerging over a longer period.(Al Jazeera)The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) came to a similar conclusion in its Digital Education Outlook 2026, a synthesis of the emerging research published in January. Where generative AI is neither built to teach nor used under any structure, it found, outsourcing tasks to the model improves performance with no real learning gains.
§ 05

Entities

12 identified
§ 06

Keywords & salience

10 terms
artificial intelligence
1.00
student learning
0.90
ai chatbots
0.80
homework
0.70
exam results
0.70
generative ai
0.60
academic performance
0.50
educational technology
0.50
stockholm university
0.40
oecd
0.40
§ 07

Topic connections

Interactive graph
Network visualization showing 51 related topics
View Full Graph
Person Organization Location Event|Click node to navigate|Edge numbers = shared articles