As jurors deliberate the Lindsay Clancy case, here are key moments from the trial

As jurors deliberate the Lindsay Clancy case, here are key moments from the trial 1 of 5 | Lindsay Clancy listens to a witness on video during her murder trial at Plymouth-superior-court" class="entity-link entity-location" data-entity-id="172188" data-entity-type="location">Plymouth Superior Court, Monday, Aug. 24, 2026 in Plymouth, Mass. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool) 2 of 5 | Patrick Clancy sits on the stand during the Lindsay Clancy murder trial at Plymouth-superior-court" class="entity-link entity-location" data-entity-id="172188" data-entity-type="location">Plymouth Superior Court in Plymouth, Mass., on Wednesday, July 29, 2026. (David L. Ryan/The Boston Globe via AP, Pool,File) 3 of 5 | Lindsay Clancy’s mother Paula Musgrove testifies about text messages between her and her daughter during her daughter’s murder trial in Plymouth-superior-court" class="entity-link entity-location" data-entity-id="172188" data-entity-type="location">Plymouth Superior Court, in Plymouth, Mass., Monday, Aug. 17, 2026. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool) 4 of 5 | Defense attorney Kevin Reddington, left, questions psychiatrist Dr. Jennifer Tufts about her hand written notes during a session with Lindsay Clancy during Clancy’s murder trial at Plymouth-superior-court" class="entity-link entity-location" data-entity-id="172188" data-entity-type="location">Plymouth Superior Court in Plymouth, Mass., Monday, Aug. 10 2026. (Greg Der/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool) 5 of 5 | Assistant DA Jennifer Sprague makes her closing arguments for the jury asking them to find Clancy guilty during the Lindsay Clancy murder trial at Plymouth-superior-court" class="entity-link entity-location" data-entity-id="172188" data-entity-type="location">Plymouth Superior Court in Plymouth, Mass., Thursday, Aug. 27, 2026. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool) Updated 2:00 AM MESZ, September 4, 2026 Add AP News on Google Add AP News as your preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. Share Share Facebook Copy Link copied Print Email X LinkedIn Bluesky Flipboard Pinterest Reddit Plymouth, Mass. (AP) — Jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial have been struggling to agree on a verdict following a trial over whether she should be held criminally responsible for killing her three young children at her Massachusetts home in 2023. Both sides agree that she did it. But her attorneys argue that Clancy was suffering from postpartum psychosis at the time and that poor mental healthcare exacerbated her condition. Prosecutors argue that she intentionally planned the killings. Over 21 days of testimony, the jury heard from dozens of witnesses, including doctors, first responders, relatives and even Clancy’s former husband. If convicted, Clancy’s sentence could be as severe as life in prison. If found not guilty, she may be released or remain confined in a mental health facility. If the jury is unable to reach a verdict, the judge could declare a mistrial. As the jury deliberates, here are key moments from the trial: EDITOR’S NOTE: This story includes discussion of suicide. If you or someone you know needs help, the national suicide and crisis lifeline in the U.S. is available by calling or texting 988. ___ Jury weighs whether Lindsay Clancy is criminally responsible for killing her children 2 MIN READ Lindsay Clancy jury goes home after a fourth day without a verdict and signals an impasse 4 MIN READ 60 What to know about the Lindsay Clancy murder trial 4 MIN READ 60 Judge declined to remove a juror Before sending the deadlocked jury home Thursday, Judge William Sullivan declined a defense request to remove one of the jurors following heated discussions from both sides. Earlier, the jury’s foreperson sent the judge a note saying a single juror won’t follow the court’s instructions about reasonable doubt. Details of the jury room conflict weren’t revealed and only briefly discussed in open court, but it raised the possibility that a single holdout was standing in the way of a verdict. Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington said the juror should have been dismissed from the case. Sullivan said removing a deliberating juror is a sensitive undertaking. The judge questioned each juror individually in private, then reread his instructions about reasonable doubt in court. Reddington said afterward outside the courthouse that the juror would be questioned again by the judge Friday. Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague said in court that she believed Sullivan’s instruction was appropriate and no further action was necessary. Jurors have sent notes to the judge at least three times since they began deliberating Aug. 27. On Tuesday, the fourth day of deliberations, jurors sent a note in the morning saying they could not unanimously agree. The note did not elaborate, and there were no clues as to whether a majority of jurors were leaning toward a conviction or acquittal. It also did not provide any insight into the tone of deliberations or whether they had been cordial or acrimonious. On Wednesday they sent the court another short note saying they were still at an impasse. Sullivan again told them to keep trying. Clancy’s former husband, Patrick Clancy, was first to take the stand. In emotional testimony, he described the day he found his wife after she tried to kill herself. Lindsay Clancy had sent him out to get takeout food and medication for their daughter, which prosecutors argue was an excuse to get him out of the house. He came home to find the house unusually silent, before finding blood throughout the main bedroom and a window open. Jurors listened to the 911 call Patrick Clancy made after finding his wife outside in the snow. Clancy can be heard speaking with his wife, then tells the dispatcher he’s going to check on the children. Moments later, he howls and cries after finding his children in the basement. The confused dispatcher repeatedly asks what happened. Clancy’s mother, mother-in-law, sister, friends and co-workers testified that Clancy struggled with her mental health after giving birth to Callan, the youngest of her three children. Clancy’s mother-in-law, Susan Clancy, said she and her former daughter-in-law were close. Both worked as labor and delivery nurses. She described Lindsay as a wonderful mother. But Susan Clancy testified that Lindsay had become anxious, paranoid and suicidal, and that the psychiatric care she was getting wasn’t helping. “She felt unwell. She had insomnia. She was losing her appetite. She was very anxious and sad,” Susan Clancy said. “She was begging for help.” Lindsay Clancy’s mother, Paula Musgrove, testified that her daughter was scared of sleeping alone, became paranoid and believed the medications she was taking “were destroying her mind.” “Mom, will you please come up and stay with me for a bit? I’m really sick. Something is wrong,” Clancy wrote in an October 2022 text message that Paula Musgrove read in court. “I had horrible insomnia all night, and I just don’t know how I am going to get through the day. … It’s just really scary, and I don’t want to be alone.” The defense questioned the quality of Clancy’s medical care Clancy saw several doctors about her declining mental health, and eventually checked herself in to a psychiatric hospital. Her lawyer, Kevin Reddington, argued that she was misdiagnosed and overmedicated. As he cross-examined one of her psychiatrists, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, Reddington questioned her expertise, prescribing decisions and use of 25-minute video appointments with limited time for talk therapy. At one point, Reddington implied that Tufts was a box-checking “robot.” “What did you do? You had a woman who was telling you she felt hopeless,” he asked as they discussed an appointment about two months before the killings. “I told her that this was something we could address, that there was hope, that there are treatments, that there are different types of programs,” Tufts said, “so she knew that she still had options and a reason to hope.” Paul Zeizel, a clinical and forensic psychologist who visited Lindsay Clancy in the hospital after she killed the children, testified that he overheard her saying that a disembodied male voice had told her she had no choice but to kill her children and then herself. Zeizel said he believed Clancy wasn’t responsible for her actions because of her deep mental illness. Prosecutors called a rebuttal witness, forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun, who said he didn’t believe Clancy had hallucinated voices. “One of the things that she said when I asked about what happened, is that in the course of strangling each child, she said, ‘Go to God, baby. Go to God,’” he said. “That was part of her expectation that she and the children would be together in heaven with God.” Dr. Gregory Saathoff, a senior psychiatrist for the FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit, testified for prosecutors that Clancy “had the capacity to know right from wrong.” After testimony was complete, each side got about an hour to make their closing argument to the jury. Reddington showed the jury a photograph of the Clancy family, looking happy, and a second one of Lindsay Clancy in the hospital. “How does this turn into this?” Reddington asked. “How? Because of the damn medicine and the lousy medical care that she got.” Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague said criticizing the mental health system was “a distraction.” She said Clancy chose to kill her children because doing so would make it easier to kill herself. “She was depressed. She was exhausted. She was done. She didn’t want to try anymore. She felt damaged,” Sprague said. “But those kids, those kids were her protective factor. Those kids were keeping her from ending her misery.”