NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence
SRCThe Guardian - World News
LANGEN
LEANCenter-Left
WORDS762
ENT3
MON · 2025-12-08 · 16:23 GMTBRIEF NSR-2025-1208-1572
News/US House passes bill authorizing $900bn /Hegseth said US military should refuse ‘unlawful’ Trump orde…
NSR-2025-1208-1572News Report·EN·Political Strategy

Hegseth said US military should refuse ‘unlawful’ Trump orders in unearthed 2016 interview

In 2016, Fox News contributor Pete Hegseth, now a US defense secretary, stated that US service members should refuse "unlawful" orders from a potential President Trump. These comments, unearthed by CNN, contradict Hegseth's recent criticism of Democratic lawmakers who expressed similar concerns about illegal orders.

Edward Helmore in New YorkThe Guardian - World NewsFiled 2025-12-08 · 16:23 GMTLean · Center-LeftRead · 4 min
Hegseth said US military should refuse ‘unlawful’ Trump orders in unearthed 2016 interview
The Guardian - World NewsFIG 01
Reading time
4min
Word count
762words
Sources cited
3cited
Entities identified
3entities
Quality score
100%
§ 01

Briefing Summary

AI-generated
NEWSAR · AI

In 2016, Fox News contributor Pete Hegseth, now a US defense secretary, stated that US service members should refuse "unlawful" orders from a potential President Trump. These comments, unearthed by CNN, contradict Hegseth's recent criticism of Democratic lawmakers who expressed similar concerns about illegal orders. The controversy stems from Trump's 2016 campaign promises to carry out actions like killing terrorists' families, which Hegseth deemed illegal at the time. Hegseth is now facing scrutiny over recent US military strikes on alleged drug trafficking boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, which have resulted in numerous deaths. Critics argue these strikes are illegal, extrajudicial killings. The Pentagon is investigating Senator Mark Kelly and other Democrats who warned military personnel against following "illegal orders" from the Trump administration.

Confidence 0.90Sources 3Claims 5Entities 3
§ 02

Article analysis

Model · rule-based
Framing
Political Strategy
Legal & Judicial
Tone
Mixed Tone
AI-assessed
CalmNeutralAlarmist
Factuality
0.70 / 1.00
Factual
LowHigh
Sources cited
3
Well sourced
FewMany
§ 03

Key claims

5 extracted
01

Hegseth compared suspected drug smugglers to al-Qaida terrorists.

factualHegseth
Confidence
1.00
02

Last month the Arizona senator Mark Kelly and five other Democrats with service records posted a video that encouraged military personnel to disobey “illegal orders”.

factualnull
Confidence
1.00
03

As a candidate in 2016, Trump vowed that US military personnel would carry out orders including killing the families of terrorists.

factualDonald Trump
Confidence
1.00
04

Pete Hegseth stated in 2016 that US service members should refuse “unlawful” orders from a potential president Trump.

factualCNN
Confidence
1.00
05

The administration’s strikes in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific now number 20 and are reported to have claimed the lives of more than 80 people.

statisticnull
Confidence
0.90
§ 04

Full report

4 min read · 762 words
The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, stated repeatedly in 2016 on Fox News that US service members should refuse “unlawful” orders from a potential president Trump – exactly the position he called “despicable” when Democratic lawmakers said it last month.The debate about whether US soldiers should refuse illegal orders is now at the center of a fiery political dispute over the US killings of alleged drug traffickers in boats off the coast of Venezuela and Colombia.In video unearthed by CNN from March of 2016, when Donald Trump was a Republican presidential candidate, Hegseth responded to Trump’s comments in a debate by clarifying that service members did, in fact, have a duty to refuse any illegal orders.“You’re not just gonna follow that order if it’s unlawful,” Hegseth, then a Fox News contributor, said in an appearance on the show Fox & Friends, where he would eventually become a host.He repeated similar comments in a Fox Business appearance later that month.As a candidate in 2016, Trump had vowed that US military personnel would carry out orders including killing the families of terrorists and reviving banned forms of torture if he became president.“The military’s not gonna follow illegal orders,” Hegseth said of Trump’s claim, which the candidate later walked back.Hegseth is now embroiled in a controversy over a second strike on an alleged drug boat on 2 September, which killed two survivors of a strike less than an hour earlier. The administration’s strikes in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific now number 20 and are reported to have claimed the lives of more than 80 people, who it says without offering evidence are smuggling narcotics.Critics have described the attacks as illegal and extrajudicial killings, noting that the crime of drug-smuggling – even if true – is not subject to execution without trial. The administration has justified its attacks by declaring various groups as “narco-terrorists”.In recent weeks, Hegseth has criticized Democrats for expressing concerns similar to those he expressed before Trump was elected.Last month the Arizona senator Mark Kelly and five other Democrats with service records posted a video that encouraged military personnel to disobey “illegal orders” from the Trump administration and warned of internal “threats to our constitution”.The Pentagon announced it was launching an investigation into Kelly after Trump protested that the senator and the other lawmakers “should be in jail right now” and suggesting they might have engaged in “seditious behavior, punishable by death”.Hegseth himself has accused the Democratic lawmakers of spreading “despicable, reckless, and false” information. On Saturday he compared suspected drug smugglers to al-Qaida terrorists. “If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you. Let there be no doubt about it,” Hegseth said at the Ronald Reagan presidential library in Simi valley, California.skip past newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotionHe further argued that Trump had the power to take military action “as he sees fit” and he dismissed concerns that the strikes violate international law. “President Trump can and will take decisive military action as he sees fit to defend our nation’s interests. Let no country on Earth doubt that for a moment,” he said.In 2016, however, he argued that service members could face criminal consequences for carrying out illegal commands, and said the military were obliged to refuse them.“Here’s the problem with Trump,” Hegseth told the Megyn Kelly show on Fox after the debate in which Trump made the comments. “He says: ‘Go ahead and kill the family. Go ahead and torture. Go ahead and go further than waterboarding.’ What happens when people follow those orders, or don’t follow them? It’s not clear that Donald Trump will have their back.“Donald Trump is oftentimes about Donald Trump,” he said, adding: ““If you’re not changing the law, and you’re just saying it, you create even more ambiguity.”The White House spokesperson Anna Kelly in a statement to CNN repeated the administration’s position that the Democrat lawmakers who issued the video “sowed doubt in a clear chain of command, which is reckless, dangerous, and deeply irresponsible for an elected official”, adding that “the military already has clear procedures for handling unlawful orders, but seditious Democrats injected ambiguity”.Hegseth made the same argument at an event in April 2016, as reported last week, telling the Liberty Forum of Silicon Valley that the US military “won’t follow unlawful orders from their commander in chief”. He added that refusing illegal commands was a part of the military’s obligation and ethical standards.Last month, he called the Democrat lawmakers who made that argument the “Seditious Six”.
§ 05

Entities

3 identified
§ 06

Keywords & salience

8 terms
unlawful orders
1.00
us military
0.80
pete hegseth
0.70
donald trump
0.70
illegal orders
0.60
extrajudicial killings
0.50
drug trafficking
0.50
military personnel
0.40
§ 07

Topic connections

Interactive graph
Network visualization showing 51 related topics
View Full Graph
Person Organization Location Event|Click node to navigate|Edge numbers = shared articles