US admiral to brief lawmakers as bipartisan scrutiny grows over boat strike

A US navy admiral will provide a classified briefing to lawmakers overseeing the military on Thursday as they investigate a US attack on a boat in the Caribbean Sea allegedly carrying drugs that included a second strike that killed any survivors.The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, on Monday said the second strike was carried out “in self-defence” and in accordance with laws governing armed conflict.Bipartisan scrutiny has mounted over a report that Pete Hegseth, the defence secretary, issued a verbal order in September to strike the vessel.Democrats have said the allegations, first reported last week by the Washington Post, could amount to a war crime, and Republicans have also voiced their concerns about the legality of the attack on 2 September. The House and Senate armed services committees have opened investigations into the recent US military strikes on vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific Ocean.In her comments to reporters on Monday, Leavitt did not dispute the Washington Post report that there were survivors after the initial strike. Her explanation came after Donald Trump a day earlier said he “wouldn’t have wanted that – not a second strike” when asked about the incident.“Secretary Hegseth authorised Adm [Frank M] Bradley to conduct these kinetic strikes,” said Leavitt. “Adm Bradley worked well within his authority and the law, directing the engagement to ensure the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated.”Bipartisan scrutiny has mounted over a report that Pete Hegseth issued a verbal order to strike the vessel. Photograph: Orlando Barría/EPALate on Monday, Hegseth posted: “Adm Mitch Bradley is an American hero, a true professional, and has my 100% support. I stand by him and the combat decisions he has made – on the September 2 mission and all others since.”A month after the strike, Bradley was promoted from commander of Joint Special Operations Command to commander of US Special Operations Command.Concern over the Trump administration’s military strikes against the alleged drug-smuggling boats has been building in Congress, but details of this follow-on strike stunned many lawmakers from both parties and generated stark questions about the legality of the attacks and the overall strategy in the region, particularly toward the Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro.The lawmakers said they did not know whether last week’s Washington Post report was true, and some Republicans were sceptical. Still, they said the reported attacking of survivors of an initial missile strike posed serious concerns and merited further scrutiny.The White House weighed in after the president on Sunday vigorously defended Hegseth. “Pete said he did not order the death of those two men,” Trump said. He added, “And I believe him.”Leavitt said Hegseth had spoken with members of Congress who may have expressed some concerns about the reports over the weekend.Gen Dan Caine, the chair of the joint chiefs of staff, also spoke over the weekend with the two Republican and two Democratic lawmakers leading the Senate and House armed services committees. He reiterated “his trust and confidence in the experienced commanders at every echelon”, Caine’s office said in a statement.The statement added that the call focused on “addressing the intent and legality of missions to disrupt illicit trafficking networks which threaten the security and stability of the western hemisphere”.The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said on Monday the second strike was carried out ‘in self-defence’ and in accordance with laws governing armed conflict. Photograph: Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesThe Senate majority leader, John Thune, on Monday broadly defended the operations, echoing the Trump administration position that they were necessary to stem the flow of illegal narcotics into the US.Thune said the committees in Congress would look into what happened. “I don’t think you want to draw any conclusions or deductions until you have all the facts,” he said of the 2 September strike. “We’ll see where they lead.”After the Post’s report, Hegseth said on Friday on X that “fake news is delivering more fabricated, inflammatory, and derogatory reporting to discredit our incredible warriors fighting to protect the homeland”.“Our current operations in the Caribbean are lawful under both US and international law, with all actions in compliance with the law of armed conflict – and approved by the best military and civilian lawyers, up and down the chain of command,” Hegseth wrote.The Senate Democratic leader, Chuck Schumer, called Hegseth a “national embarrassment” over his response to critics. Schumer demanded that Hegseth release the video of the strike and testify under oath about what happened.The Republican senator for Mississippi, Roger Wicker, the chair of the Senate armed services committee, pledged that his panel’s investigation would be “done by the numbers”.“We’ll find out the ground truth,” he said, adding that the ramifications of the report were “serious charges”.The 2 September strike was one in a series carried out by the US military in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean as Trump has ordered the buildup of a fleet of warships near Venezuela, including the largest US aircraft carrier. More than 80 people were killed in the strikes.