For Iran’s Rulers, Refusing U.S. Demands Is a Risk Worth Taking

New York Times - WorldCenter-LeftEN 6 min read 100% complete by Erika SolomonFebruary 23, 2026 at 11:04 AM

AI Summary

long article 6 min

In February 2026, despite a buildup of U.S. military power in the Persian Gulf, Iran is refusing to concede to U.S. demands regarding its nuclear program and ballistic missiles. Analysts suggest Iran's leaders view these concessions as a greater threat to their survival than the risk of war with the U.S. The U.S. insists on zero uranium enrichment and limits to Iran's missile range, while Iran considers enrichment a right and missile defense crucial. Negotiations between U.S. and Iranian officials are scheduled for Geneva this Thursday, but a dangerous mismatch in perceptions makes a deal fragile and a regional conflict increasingly likely. Iran prioritizes its ideological stance and place in history, even if it risks immediate survival.

Key Entities & Roles

Key Player Opposition Context

Israel 30% Geneva 30% University of Tehran 40% Sasan Karimi 40% President Trump 50% Persian Gulf 50% Ayatollah Ali Khamenei ×260% Washington 60% Tehran ×270% United States ×780% Iran ×1190%

Keywords

iran 100% united states 90% nuclear program 80% u.s. demands 70% ballistic missiles 70% uranium enrichment 60% risk of war 60% negotiations 50% economic crisis 40% regional conflict 40%