New York Times accuses Pentagon of flouting judge’s order blocking its press access policy
The New York Times has accused the Pentagon of disregarding a judge's order that blocked its policy restricting press access to the Defense Department headquarters. The newspaper's lawyer argued in court on Monday that the Pentagon implemented a revised policy that circumvents the judge's March 20 ruling, which stated the original policy violated journalists' constitutional rights.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedThe New York Times has accused the Pentagon of disregarding a judge's order that blocked its policy restricting press access to the Defense Department headquarters. The newspaper's lawyer argued in court on Monday that the Pentagon implemented a revised policy that circumvents the judge's March 20 ruling, which stated the original policy violated journalists' constitutional rights. US District Judge Paul Friedman had previously sided with The New York Times, ordering the reinstatement of credentials for seven reporters. The New York Times claims the new policy imposes even stricter limitations on journalists, prompting them to urge the judge to enforce compliance with the original order. The judge did not immediately issue a ruling after hearing arguments from both sides.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedFriedman sided with The New York Times earlier this month.
US District Judge Paul Friedman did not immediately rule after hearing arguments.
The Pentagon’s new credential policy violated journalists’ constitutional rights.
The New York Times accuses Pentagon of flouting a court order blocking its press access policy.
They’ve only made things worse.