NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence
SRCThe Guardian - World News
LANGEN
LEANCenter-Left
WORDS497
ENT7
THU · 2026-04-09 · 15:13 GMTBRIEF NSR-2026-0409-60624
News/Jo Malone ‘surprised and sad’ after being sued £200,000 for …
NSR-2026-0409-60624News Report·EN·Legal & Judicial

Jo Malone ‘surprised and sad’ after being sued £200,000 for using her name on fragrances

Jo Malone is being sued for over £200,000 by Estée Lauder Companies, who own Jo Malone London, for trademark infringement related to her collaboration with Zara. Malone sold her original brand to Estée Lauder in 1999, which included restrictions on using her name for fragrance marketing.

Julia KolleweThe Guardian - World NewsFiled 2026-04-09 · 15:13 GMTLean · Center-LeftRead · 2 min
Jo Malone ‘surprised and sad’ after being sued £200,000 for using her name on fragrances
The Guardian - World NewsFIG 01
Reading time
2min
Word count
497words
Sources cited
3cited
Entities identified
7entities
Quality score
100%
§ 01

Briefing Summary

AI-generated
NEWSAR · AI

Jo Malone is being sued for over £200,000 by Estée Lauder Companies, who own Jo Malone London, for trademark infringement related to her collaboration with Zara. Malone sold her original brand to Estée Lauder in 1999, which included restrictions on using her name for fragrance marketing. The lawsuit stems from the packaging and marketing of the Jo Loves x Zara fragrance line, launched in 2019, which clearly states the products are "A creation by Jo Malone CBE, founder of Jo Loves." Estée Lauder argues this infringes on their trademark. Malone expressed her surprise and sadness at the legal action, emphasizing that Zara approached her personally for the collaboration, not her former company. She maintains that she sold a company, not herself, and has taken steps to differentiate her current work from Jo Malone London.

Confidence 0.90Sources 3Claims 5Entities 7
§ 02

Article analysis

Model · rule-based
Framing
Legal & Judicial
Human Interest
Tone
Measured
AI-assessed
CalmNeutralAlarmist
Factuality
0.70 / 1.00
Factual
LowHigh
Sources cited
3
Well sourced
FewMany
§ 03

Key claims

5 extracted
01

Ms Malone’s use of the name ‘Jo Malone’ undermines Jo Malone London’s unique brand equity.

quoteEstée Lauder
Confidence
1.00
02

In 2019, Jo Loves launched a collaboration with Zara that included eight scents.

factual
Confidence
1.00
03

Malone sold her perfume brand to Estée Lauder in 1999 and was blocked from using her name for fragrance marketing.

factual
Confidence
1.00
04

Estée Lauder Companies, which owns Jo Malone London, is taking legal action, claiming trademark infringement.

factual
Confidence
1.00
05

Jo Malone is being sued for more than £200,000 for using her name on fragrances she created for Zara.

factual
Confidence
1.00
§ 04

Full report

2 min read · 497 words
The British perfumer Jo Malone has said she is “surprised and very sad” after being sued for more than £200,000 in damages for using her name on fragrances she created for the fashion chain Zara.It emerged last month that New York-based multinational Estée Lauder Companies, which owns brands M.A.C, Bobbi Brown, Estée Lauder and Jo Malone London, was taking legal action, claiming the fragrance entrepreneur infringed trademarks.Malone sold her perfume brand to the US cosmetics group in 1999 in a deal under which she was blocked from using her name for particular commercial reasons, including the marketing of fragrance.She stepped down as creative director of the Jo Malone brand in 2006 and has since said she regretted selling the rights to her name, calling it the “biggest mistake of my life”.Jo Loves collaboration perfume with Zara. Photograph: ZaraAfter a non-compete clause ended in 2011, Malone set up the Jo Loves brand. In 2019, the perfume brand launched a collaboration with Zara that included eight scents, which sell for £35.99. The packaging made clear the products were created by Malone and the latest version includes the words: “A creation by Jo Malone CBE, founder of Jo Loves.”Estée Lauder took issue with this wording, and high court documents show the company and Jo Malone Ltd expect to recover more than £200,000 in damages.Speaking for the first time since then, Malone posted a video on Instagram defending the use of her name.“My name is Jo Malone. I am the person, the fragrance creator, the entrepreneur, the cancer survivor, the person,” she said. “I never expected to receive a high court claim with my name on it.”She said when Zara approached her seven years ago about working together, “they approached me, they didn’t approach a company, they didn’t approach a brand, they didn’t approach a logo. They approached me, Jo Malone, the person, and asked whether I would start working with them and create beautiful fragrances that everyone could wear in the world.”She added: “I sold a company, I did not sell myself.“We have gone above and beyond and above and beyond again to make sure everyone understands this has nothing to do with Jo Malone London, the company. This is very much Jo Malone. By using Ms Jo Malone CBE, Jo Malone creative director of Jo Loves, we’ve literally done as much as we possibly can … We’ve trained the staff, everything.“Where do I go from here? Who can I be? I can’t stop being a person. Nobody can stop being the character and the person that you are.”Estée Lauder was approached for comment.The company previously said: “Ms Malone’s use of the name ‘Jo Malone’ in connection with recent commercial ventures goes beyond that legal agreement and undermines Jo Malone London’s unique brand equity.“We respect Ms Malone’s right to pursue new opportunities. But legally binding contractual obligations cannot be disregarded, and when those terms are breached, we will protect the brand that we have invested in and built over decades.”
§ 05

Entities

7 identified
§ 06

Keywords & salience

9 terms
jo malone
1.00
fragrance
0.90
trademark infringement
0.80
perfume
0.80
jo loves
0.70
estée lauder
0.70
legal action
0.60
zara collaboration
0.60
brand rights
0.50
§ 07

Topic connections

Interactive graph
No topic relationship data available yet. This graph will appear once topic relationships have been computed.