A close mainland relative cried her eyes out while video-calling with my wife and me recently. Like many in
China who have bought property since the late 2010s, she is sitting on a big loss with her flat outside downtown
Chongqing.The city saw sales pick up around the time of the Spring Festival, traditionally an off-season. But when she tried her luck, the offers from potential buyers were brutal, and she called off the sale.Knowing that I work for an English-language newspaper in Hong Kong and may have access to market intelligence – I don’t – she asked for my opinion. What do I know about real-life investment?But I did not want to disappoint her. So I quoted an analysis by
UBS Group AG, which predicts a rebound soon, and one by
Bloomberg, which argues for a medium-term recovery starting next year. I did not have the heart to show her a new paper co-written by
Kenneth Rogoff, a prominent
Harvard economist and former official of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the
US Federal Reserve Board, which compares
China’s real estate slump with
Japan’s “lost decade”.“A Tale of Two Countries: The Real Estate Crises in 1990s
Japan and Contemporary
China” is published by the
Brookings Institution. In it, Rogoff and IMF economist
Yuanchen Yang argue that
China’s property downturn, now into its sixth year, “appears to be in the middle stages of a multi-year correction”.The property market “has exerted such substantial contractionary effects” on the broader economy. The authors point out that real estate – which is linked to sectors such as building materials, furniture and utilities – and infrastructure cover almost one-third of economic demand in
China. Moreover, mainland households allocate nearly 70 per cent of their wealth to housing, far more than major economies such as
Japan and the
United States.
China’s ongoing crisis resembles
Japan’s real estate collapse from the late 1980s. Two striking similarities are that both countries suffer from a rapidly ageing population and oversupply in the property sector.A light rail train passes directly through a residential building in
Chongqing on June 16, 2025. Photo: Getty Images“If
China’s adjustment unfolds in a similar way as
Japan’s, it would mean
China has not gone halfway through the transition,” the economists wrote.Bank failures and credit crunches further drive the real estate market’s down cycle. The persistence of the downturn negatively impacts investment, consumption and sentiment. Cities with the most oversupply are experiencing an investment overhang that could suppress new construction for a long time, while sharp property price declines depress consumption and undermine household and commercial investment confidence.“In the absence of comprehensive social safety nets, housing wealth is a form of precautionary savings; when housing values decline, households tend to scale back spending to offset losses and … try to build up savings even more,” the authors wrote.I did not show my relative their paper. I hope she won’t read this column, look it up and get all depressed. In any case, such analyses offer a macro view. Who knows what will happen to real estate in her neighbourhood?Residential buildings are seen along Suzhou Creek in Shanghai, on June 27, 2024. Photo: NurPhoto via Getty ImagesBut, as stated earlier, I did show her a more optimistic prognosis. Two weeks ago,
Bloomberg Economics argued against what it called “the Japanification thesis” in an analysis headlined, “Light at End of the Tunnel for
China’s Property Slump.”Further ReadingNote that there isn’t a weasel-out question mark at the end, so it’s a definite statement. It reckons
China’s property slump could bottom out in 2027.
China’s property construction peaked at 1,565 million square meters in 2021. But a 40 per cent drop in property investment means the adjustment is roughly 70 per cent done, with the remaining 30 per cent to be finished within two years, that is, by 2027.“
China’s property downturn will have lasted around six years from a 2021 peak to a 2027 [trough],” it said. “That’s roughly the same duration as the US housing downturn from 2006 to 2012 and way shorter than the two-decade downturn seen in
Japan. So much for the Japanification thesis.”However,
Bloomberg Economics is explicit that it “isn’t calling for a rebound either,” only stabilisation of the market. John Lam, UBS’ head of
China property research, has been the most optimistic. Having given up on earlier bullish calls, he nevertheless seems to think a rebound will come within a few years. Earlier in 2025, he had predicted home prices could “turn stable” as soon as this year.So, we have covered all our bases: imminent recovery, near-term stabilisation and more pain to come. I hope that helps, no?