As a global Warring States era begins, China must plan for the future
Strategic thinkers in Beijing are increasingly viewing global politics as entering a "Warring States era," moving away from the established post-World War II order. This perspective contrasts with the previously dominant "Thucydides Trap" framework, which emphasized inevitable conflict between a rising China and the established United States.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedStrategic thinkers in Beijing are increasingly viewing global politics as entering a "Warring States era," moving away from the established post-World War II order. This perspective contrasts with the previously dominant "Thucydides Trap" framework, which emphasized inevitable conflict between a rising China and the established United States. Beijing perceives the U.S. as acting more opportunistically and disregarding international rules, particularly under the Trump administration. This shift is evidenced by U.S. actions in Venezuela and Iran, and the increasing strategic autonomy sought by countries in Europe, North America, and the Middle East. Consequently, China believes its future success will depend more on presenting a reliable political vision than solely on economic power.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedGraham Allison popularized the term Thucydides Trap.
The Thucydides Trap has been a dominant framework for understanding China-US relations for much of the past decade.
Strategic elites in Beijing see world politics as sliding from the Spring and Autumn period to the Warring States era.
Many, including China, now question the stability of the global order established after the second world war.
Washington's posture towards trade, alliances and multilateral institutions has grown more opportunistic and erratic.