EXPLAINERSudan recalls its ambassador to
Addis Ababa as drone attacks shatter sense of calm after years of civil war.A drone attack in
Khartoum International Airport comes after it received its first international flight in three years [Airport Social Media via Reuters]Published On 6 May 2026The Sudanese government has accused
Ethiopia and the
United Arab Emirates of being behind recent drone attacks, including at
Khartoum airport.Military spokesperson Brigadier General
Asim Awad Abdelwahab told a news conference on Tuesday that
Sudan’s government, which has recalled its ambassador from
Ethiopia, had obtained evidence of four drone attacks since March 1 originating from neighbouring
Ethiopia’s
Bahir Dar airport. It claims the UAE provided the drones used in the attacks.Recommended Stories list of 3 itemslist 1 of 3Families forced into displacement by famine in Sudanlist 2 of 3The UAE’s OPEC exit is not about oil; it is the end of Gulf solidaritylist 3 of 3Khartoum drone strike kills five in
Sudan, NGO reportsend of list“What
Ethiopia and the UAE have done is direct aggression against
Sudan and won’t be met with silence,” Abdelwahab said.Foreign Minister
Mohieddin Salem said that while
Khartoum will not initiate attacks against other countries, “whoever attacks us will be met with a response”, and that
Sudan was ready to “enter into an open confrontation” with
Ethiopia “if it becomes necessary”.His comments came following a strike on Monday at the airport in
Sudan’s capital,
Khartoum. Previous attacks have been launched towards the Sudanese states of Kordofan, Blue Nile and White Nile.A drone attack on Saturday on Omdurman,
Sudan’s second-largest city, killed five people travelling on a civilian bus, while another attack the following day in the central
Sudan state of Gezira killed relatives of Abu Agla Kaikal, a commander with the
Sudan-shield-forces" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="122999" data-entity-type="organization">
Sudan Shield Forces, a group allied with the Sudanese military, who defected from the rival
Rapid Support Forces (RSF) earlier in the war.Drone attacks have been frequent since
Sudan descended into a bloody civil war on April 15, 2023, the result of a power struggle between the RSF, a powerful paramilitary force, and the
Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), but
Khartoum was now considered largely safe.
Khartoum International Airport, where some of the early fighting between the RSF and
Sudan’s army took place, received its first international flight in three years last week, before the string of attacks shattered the sense of calm in the capital and in central
Sudan.(Al Jazeera)Why are
Sudan and
Ethiopia trading accusations?Both countries are facing enormous internal challenges and have accused each other of supporting their armed opponents.On Tuesday,
Ethiopia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs rejected
Sudan’s “baseless accusations” and blamed its army for supporting “mercenaries” from the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), whose armed wing fought a civil war against
Ethiopia’s federal government from 2020 to 2022.“
Sudan is serving as a hub for various anti-Ethiopian forces,” the Foreign Ministry in
Addis Ababa wrote on X.“The
Sudanese Armed Forces have also provided arms and financial support to these mercenaries, thereby facilitating their incursions along
Ethiopia’s western frontier.”The statement added it was “evident that these hostile actions, as well as the recent and earlier series of allegations by officials of
Sudanese Armed Forces, are undertaken at the behest of external patrons seeking to advance their own nefarious agenda”.
Sudan and
Ethiopia have long been embroiled in armed conflict over disputed strips of farmland along the frontier in the al-Fashaga region. Most recently, the construction by
Ethiopia of Africa’s largest hydroelectric dam on the Blue Nile, the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), led to tensions with
Sudan and Egypt, which rely heavily on the Nile for water supplies.Alan Boswell, Horn of Africa director at the International Crisis Group, said
Sudan and
Ethiopia are becoming increasingly vocal in their reciprocal accusations. “That obviously creates a very dangerous dynamic between the two countries and risks making their own internal challenges much worse,” he told Al Jazeera.Boswell added that this makes both conflicts more “regionalised”, requiring de-escalation efforts to come from abroad. “That has been a focus of US diplomacy, but that has yet to gain traction,” he said.What is the UAE’s involvement in
Sudan’s war?
Sudan has accused the UAE of providing support to RSF paramilitaries during the civil war with the Sudanese army, a charge the Gulf state denies.An unnamed UAE official told the AFP news agency: “These fabrications are part of a calculated pattern of deflection – shifting blame to others to evade responsibility for their own actions – and are intended to prolong the war and obstruct a genuine peace process.”But Abdelwahab,
Sudan’s military spokesperson, said the government had “conclusive evidence” from data recovered from a drone shot down in el-Obeid, the capital of North Kordofan state, that UAE-made drones had been launched from
Ethiopia’s northeastern
Bahir Dar airport region. These struck Sudanese army positions across several states on March 1 and 17, he said.Unmanned vehicles also attacked sites in
Khartoum since Friday, including
Khartoum’s airport on Monday, he added.Rights groups, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have also accused the UAE of providing arms to the RSF.Several observers have argued the UAE’s alleged involvement in
Sudan’s civil war could serve Abu Dhabi’s desire to expand its influence across the Red Sea and East Africa, especially since relations with Saudi Arabia – which supports
Sudan’s army – have been increasingly tense. Abu Dhabi has sought to position itself as a global trading hub for gold as it seeks to diversify from its oil-dependent economy, and may view
Sudan’s untapped mineral wealth, including gold, as an opportunity, experts say.Boswell, at the International Crisis Group, said
Sudan’s General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and
Ethiopia’s Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed were being “emboldened and encouraged on the path towards escalation by their outside backers”.“But they have shown in the past that they’re able to meet together and de-escalate things,” he said. “Because really [it] benefits neither [to] get more deeply involved in the other’s civil war.”