NEWSAR
Multi-perspective news intelligence
SRCThe Guardian - World News
LANGEN
LEANCenter-Left
WORDS553
ENT12
MON · 2026-05-25 · 08:00 GMTBRIEF NSR-2026-0525-78991
News/Focus on jobs, not benefits, to cut welfare bill, says think…
NSR-2026-0525-78991News Report·EN·Economic Impact

Focus on jobs, not benefits, to cut welfare bill, says thinktank

A report by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) suggests that focusing on job creation, rather than benefit cuts, is the most effective way to reduce the welfare bill. The JRF economists estimate that achieving the government's target of 80% employment among the working-age population would save £10 billion on Universal Credit.

Heather StewartThe Guardian - World NewsFiled 2026-05-25 · 08:00 GMTLean · Center-LeftRead · 3 min
Focus on jobs, not benefits, to cut welfare bill, says thinktank
The Guardian - World NewsFIG 01
Reading time
3min
Word count
553words
Sources cited
3cited
Entities identified
12entities
Quality score
100%
§ 01

Briefing Summary

AI-generated
NEWSAR · AI

A report by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) suggests that focusing on job creation, rather than benefit cuts, is the most effective way to reduce the welfare bill. The JRF economists estimate that achieving the government's target of 80% employment among the working-age population would save £10 billion on Universal Credit. Polling indicates that 59% of voters prefer tackling the root causes of joblessness to reduce welfare costs, compared to 20% who favor restricting benefit eligibility. The research highlights that health-related Universal Credit claims have increased in areas with fewer job opportunities. The JRF advocates for government prioritization of measures like public health support, social housing construction, and regional economic regeneration.

Confidence 0.90Sources 3Claims 5Entities 12
§ 02

Article analysis

Model · rule-based
Framing
Economic Impact
Social Justice
Tone
Measured
AI-assessed
CalmNeutralAlarmist
Factuality
0.70 / 1.00
Factual
LowHigh
Sources cited
3
Well sourced
FewMany
§ 03

Key claims

5 extracted
01

Almost a million young people aged 16 to 24 are not in education, employment, or training (Neets).

statisticAlan Milburn (implied)
Confidence
0.90
02

Official projections show spending on non-pensioner benefits will remain flat at around 5% of GDP for the remainder of the parliament.

statisticJoseph Rowntree Foundation
Confidence
0.90
03

Getting 80% of the working age population into jobs would cut universal credit costs by £10bn, an eighth of the current bill.

statisticJoseph Rowntree Foundation
Confidence
0.90
04

Claims for health-related universal credit have risen more since Covid in areas with fewer local jobs.

statisticJoseph Rowntree Foundation
Confidence
0.80
05

59% of voters support reducing the welfare bill by tackling underlying causes, compared to 20% for restricting benefit eligibility.

statisticMore in Common survey
Confidence
0.80
§ 04

Full report

3 min read · 553 words
Tackling the root causes of joblessness, instead of cutting benefits, is the best way to get the welfare bill down, and polling shows voters support that approach, according to research by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.In a forthcoming report, JRF economists show that hitting the government’s target of getting 80% of the working age population into jobs would cut the cost of universal credit by £10bn – an eighth of the current bill.The research seeks to push back against the “dominant political narrative” that spending on social security is “spiralling”. Instead, it points out that official projections show spending on non-pensioner benefits “will remain flat, at around 5% of GDP for the remainder of the parliament”.Sam Tims, JRF’s lead analyst, said: “We know what happens when the holes in the safety net are made ever bigger. The reasons people need support don’t disappear, instead low-income families go hungry.“So government should focus on the root causes of economic insecurity. These are the underlying economic failures that drive social security need – like the decent jobs that need to be created, the affordable homes we need, and better health.”A survey of more than 4,000 voters by the pollster More in Common, carried out alongside the JRF research, showed that when asked how the government should reduce the welfare bill, 59% supported the idea of reducing it in the longer term by tackling the underlying causes.Queuing to enter the London Job Show employment fair at the Westfield shopping centre on 15 May. Photograph: Susannah Ireland/The GuardianThat compared with 20% who opted for cutting costs quickly by restricting eligibility for benefits, and 8% for reducing how much claimants receive. Among those who voted Labour, LibDem or Green at the 2024 general election, 70% supported the longer-term approach.The report contains calls for the government to prioritise measures such as increasing support for public health, building more social housing, and regenerating struggling regional economies.The research shows that claims for health-related universal credit have risen more since the Covid pandemic in places where there are fewer jobs available locally, many of them former industrial or coastal areas.It comes ahead of this week’s publication of the interim report from an inquiry into tackling young people not in education, employment or training (Neet) by Alan Milburn, the former cabinet minister who went on to chair the Social Mobility Commission.Almost a million young people aged 16 to 24 are Neets. The former Labour minister has highlighted the fact that far more is spent on benefits for this group than on helping them into work.He is expected to recommend benefits reforms when his final report is published later this year, but any call for cuts could prove controversial. Labour’s plan to reduce the personal independence payments received by disabled people was drastically scaled back last year, after a revolt by backbench MPs.A DWP spokesperson said: “Reforming welfare is about getting people who can into work. Our investment in subsidised work, jobs grants, apprenticeships and training will support half a million young people.“Putting the Right to Try into law is allowing people on sickness and disability benefits to try work without the immediate fear of losing their benefits, while our £3.5bn investment in employment support for sick and disabled people is giving them the genuine help they need to move into work and out of poverty.”
§ 05

Entities

12 identified
§ 06

Keywords & salience

10 terms
welfare bill
1.00
joblessness
0.90
joseph rowntree foundation
0.80
universal credit
0.80
economic insecurity
0.70
decent jobs
0.70
affordable homes
0.60
public health
0.50
social housing
0.50
neet
0.40
§ 07

Topic connections

Interactive graph
No topic relationship data available yet. This graph will appear once topic relationships have been computed.