Focus on jobs, not benefits, to cut welfare bill, says thinktank
A report by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) suggests that focusing on job creation, rather than benefit cuts, is the most effective way to reduce the welfare bill. The JRF economists estimate that achieving the government's target of 80% employment among the working-age population would save £10 billion on Universal Credit.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedA report by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) suggests that focusing on job creation, rather than benefit cuts, is the most effective way to reduce the welfare bill. The JRF economists estimate that achieving the government's target of 80% employment among the working-age population would save £10 billion on Universal Credit. Polling indicates that 59% of voters prefer tackling the root causes of joblessness to reduce welfare costs, compared to 20% who favor restricting benefit eligibility. The research highlights that health-related Universal Credit claims have increased in areas with fewer job opportunities. The JRF advocates for government prioritization of measures like public health support, social housing construction, and regional economic regeneration.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedAlmost a million young people aged 16 to 24 are not in education, employment, or training (Neets).
Official projections show spending on non-pensioner benefits will remain flat at around 5% of GDP for the remainder of the parliament.
Getting 80% of the working age population into jobs would cut universal credit costs by £10bn, an eighth of the current bill.
Claims for health-related universal credit have risen more since Covid in areas with fewer local jobs.
59% of voters support reducing the welfare bill by tackling underlying causes, compared to 20% for restricting benefit eligibility.