The
Gymkhana is expensive to join, but access has long been controlled more by gatekeeping than price. Applicants must be proposed and seconded by members, after which a managing committee approves them. The process has traditionally favoured senior civil servants and defence officers, with a smaller share for others. Critics say this has helped sustain inequality, even as it has made the
Gymkhana one of
Delhi's most sought-after memberships.But many recall how the place kept alive a fragment of
Delhi's elite past through small rituals: liveried waiters at dusk, gin and lime on shaded verandas, retired generals and diplomats lingering under neem trees.A
Delhi-based senior journalist who never had a membership told the
BBC the club always felt "distant". "But now I feel like stepping in once. It is one of the few structures in
Delhi that has remained untouched while the city outside changed completely," he said.Getty ImagesThe club is located on Safdarjung Road in central DelhiFounded in 1913 as the
Delhi-
Gymkhana-club" class="entity-link entity-organization" data-entity-id="134139" data-entity-type="organization">Imperial
Delhi Gymkhana Club, it emerged alongside the making of
Delhi after the British shifted
India's capital from
Kolkata (formerly Calcutta). It first operated from the Coronation Grounds in Civil Lines, serving British administrators and military officers, before being allotted its present site on Safdarjung Road in 1928.The current clubhouse, designed in the 1930s by British architect
Robert Tor Russell - who also designed the iconic
Connaught Place - reflects the architecture of early central
Delhi, with its deep verandahs, high ceilings and pale façades opening onto trees and lawns.Inside, time seemed to move differently: tennis whites drying beneath the afternoon sun, bridge rooms carrying the faint smell of cigarettes and talcum powder, elderly members reading newspapers beneath slow ceiling fans.History lingered there in intimate ways.In its early decades, westernised Indian Civil Service officers - among the few Indians admitted into elite colonial circles - reportedly learned ballroom dancing and British social etiquette at the club as they navigated the codes of imperial society.And in 1947, as the British Indian Army was divided between
India and the newly created
Pakistan, officers from regiments about to be separated gathered at the club for farewell drinks before history placed them on either side of a border.That image - officers sharing one final evening together - helps explain why the possible closure of the
Gymkhana feels so emotional to many in
Delhi.Places like these become repositories of memory, carrying traces of different eras inside them. "Cities are layered entities. Different generations leave their mark on them," historian Narayani Gupta once observed.During the final years of British rule and the early decades after independence, the club remained closely connected to the capital's political life. Speaking at the
Gymkhana's centenary celebrations in 2013, then President Pranab Mukherjee recalled that Mahatma Gandhi and Lord Irwin, then Viceroy of
India, had met privately there, leading to what became known as the Gandhi-Irwin pact.After 1947, "Imperial" was dropped from the club's name, but much of the atmosphere remained: dress codes, old carpets, evening drinks and familiar waiters serving generations of the same families.
Delhi Gymkhana Club/GalleryCottages in the
Gymkhana Club, which sits beside some of
India's most powerful addressesOver time, the
Gymkhana also became shorthand for a certain kind of inherited privilege in
Delhi.Its notoriously long waiting lists - often stretching across decades - became part of city folklore, while critics saw the club as a symbol of influence shaped by personal networks and family legacy.A retired Indian Police Service officer told the
BBC it took him 18 years to get a membership. "When I applied, I was fascinated by the idea," he said. "By the time I became one, I was totally indifferent and rarely visited it."Ghazal Tansir, a
Delhi-based doctor who first visited the club for her wedding reception in 2019 through a relative's membership, described it as "a preserved, undisturbed little nook of memories".That exclusivity increasingly came under scrutiny after Modi's government came to power in 2014, promising to shift power away from
Delhi's long-established English-speaking elite.Following inspections in 2016 and 2019, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs approached a government tribunal in 2020, alleging financial irregularities and violations of membership rules at the club.Two years later, the tribunal dissolved the club's elected governing committee and allowed the government to appoint administrators in its place - a move that drew criticism from some members.The latest eviction order has once again divided opinion.Kiran Bedi, a former top police officer who was once the chief ministerial candidate for
Delhi from Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), called it "unfortunate and tragic", describing the
Gymkhana as part of the capital's sporting and institutional heritage. Historian Swapna Liddle acknowledged the club's elitist origins, but said she would have preferred efforts to reform the institution rather than shutting it down. "Instead of just saying 'let it not exist', you [the government] could have asked how it could be changed and made meaningful for more people," she said.Others took a different view. Journalist Prabhu Chawla criticised clubs like the
Gymkhana as exclusionary institutions operating on heavily subsidised public land.Former diplomat KC Singh, however, said such clubs historically gave civil servants and military officers affordable recreational spaces despite modest government salaries.BJP spokesperson RP Singh rejected suggestions that the government was unfairly targeting the club. "It is a property leased by the government," he told the
BBC. "Everything has happened according to the rule book and relevant laws."Beneath the legal and political arguments, however, runs a more emotional response - one tied to memory and loss in a city that is constantly changing.
Delhi has spent decades remaking itself. Almost every resident carries a private atlas of vanished places: Regal Cinema, the old Coffee House, Urdu bookshops in Daryaganj, winter evenings at
India Gate before barricades and security cordons reshaped the city.And yet some places seemed to outlast that churn.