White House urges UK not to ban social media for under-16s
The White House has urged the UK not to ban social media for under-16s, arguing such restrictions would place a "disproportionate" burden on US tech companies. In a submission to a UK government consultation on online safety, the US administration opposed "one-size-fits-all government restrictions" and suggested parents should be given "robust tools" to manage children's online activity instead of outright bans.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedThe White House has urged the UK not to ban social media for under-16s, arguing such restrictions would place a "disproportionate" burden on US tech companies. In a submission to a UK government consultation on online safety, the US administration opposed "one-size-fits-all government restrictions" and suggested parents should be given "robust tools" to manage children's online activity instead of outright bans. This stance reflects ongoing tension between the White House and Downing Street over the UK's approach to online safety legislation, which some US officials have criticized as censorship. The UK is reportedly considering announcing a ban on "harmful" social media apps next week, alongside other restrictive measures for minors. The White House has expressed concern about regulations that disproportionately affect American companies.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedMeta is seeking a judicial review of the UK's Online Safety Act regarding its fees and fines regime.
Age-gating for 13- to 16-year-olds would not work, as technical methods cannot be repurposed for younger thresholds.
The US government opposes 'prescribed one-size-fits-all government restrictions' and 'blunt regulatory instruments' for online harms.
The White House urged the UK not to ban social media for under-16s, citing disproportionate burden on US tech firms.
The UK prime minister is expected to announce a ban on 'harmful' social media apps next week.