Iran negotiator Ghalibaf rejects claim unfrozen funds will buy US goods
Iran's Parliament Speaker and chief negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, has rejected claims by the US administration that unfrozen Iranian assets will be exclusively used to purchase American agricultural products. Ghalibaf stated on social media that the US falsely claims these funds will buy their agriculture, asserting that Iran's "harvest" is decades of mistrust.

Briefing Summary
AI-generatedIran's Parliament Speaker and chief negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, has rejected claims by the US administration that unfrozen Iranian assets will be exclusively used to purchase American agricultural products. Ghalibaf stated on social media that the US falsely claims these funds will buy their agriculture, asserting that Iran's "harvest" is decades of mistrust. This denial contradicts statements from US President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance, who suggested the funds would go towards American farmers and alleviate Iran's "hunger problem." Iranian media has framed the agreement as a strategic victory, with Ghalibaf reportedly calling it a "declaration of US defeat" and asserting no legal clauses mandate the purchase of US commodities.
Article analysis
Model · rule-basedKey claims
5 extractedIranian state media framed the agreement as a strategic victory rather than a concession.
Ghalibaf described the memorandum as a 'declaration of US defeat' with no legal clauses mandating the purchase of US commodities.
Donald Trump claimed initial financial relief would include $500 million in American goods, not direct cash to Tehran.
The US administration stated that unfrozen funds would be spent on produce from American farmers.
Iran's parliament speaker rejected claims that unfrozen funds would be spent exclusively on US agricultural exports.